Website review, no card needed
ekocups.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202630 issues · 71 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on ekocups.com, 11 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #49,525 of 89,086 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #29,774 of 46,432 online storesbeats 31%
- #28,091 of 41,681 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 779 KiBAbout 779 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.8 s
A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 2.0 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 963 ms
963 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 963 ms of main-thread work and 882 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 123 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (123 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 320 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Shopify adds 243 ms
243 msShopify costs a phone 243 ms of main-thread work and 294 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,951 HTML elements
The page has 1,951 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 229 KiB11 images could be 229 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
220 ms · 42 KiBAbout 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 220 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.0 s
25.0 sYour largest element takes 25.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 27.5 s
27.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 150 ms
150 msReal visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 530 ms
530 msReal visitors wait 530 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 314 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 314 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (104), images 1.8 MB (35) and fonts 1.2 MB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.74 g of CO₂e: 208.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 links without text
2 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (20 characters)
Your title is only 20 characters: “Ekocups – Crazy Cups”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
10 links crawlers can't follow
10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
191 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 191 pages on ekocups.com and 7 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://crazycups.com/pages/ekocups.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://crazycups.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
/collections/all, /collections/ground-coffee-1, /collections/the-hot-chocolate-new, /collections/specialty-lattes-capps, /pages/iced-coffee-flavors and /collections/coffee-pods-1 and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
/pages/loyalty-rewards, /pages/subscribe-to-save, /pages/fall-collection and /pages/iced-coffee-flavors have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 console error
1 error was logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_FAILED”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 757 words of copy
The homepage carries about 757 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “SUBSCRIBE & GET 20% OFF”, “Shop All” and “Order Tracking”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ekocups.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on ekocups.com, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.