Website review, no card needed

eletsonline.com logo

eletsonline.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202643 issues · 102 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on eletsonline.com, 14 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
179 ms121 msMay 9Oct 24157 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026162 ms
May 16, 2026162 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 2026131 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026147 ms
Jul 11, 2026159 ms
Jul 18, 2026164 ms
Jul 25, 2026172 ms
Aug 1, 2026170 ms
Aug 8, 2026172 ms
Aug 15, 2026145 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026142 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026164 ms
Oct 10, 2026166 ms
Oct 17, 2026157 ms
Oct 24, 2026157 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

8 to fix57
  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 s · 4.0 MB

    41 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    720 ms · 732 KiB

    About 732 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 720 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and jQuery CDN and others), adding 1.5 MB and 635 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 425 ms

    425 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 425 ms of main-thread work and 982 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 938 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    181 KiB

    About 181 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    38 KiB

    38 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix63
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.6 s

    25.6 s

    Your largest element takes 25.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Popup image 1”.

  • Speed Index: 21.7 s

    21.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.1 s

    30.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 898 ms

    898 ms

    Real visitors wait 898 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 32 images without width and height

    32 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 157 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% faster for real visitors

    -40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 200 ms

    200 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 200 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 12.8 MB in 172 requests

    12.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.8 MB in 172 requests on a phone: images 11.0 MB (128), scripts 1.3 MB (19) and fonts 279 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 4.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 12 images far larger than shown

    2.0 MB

    12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Maha_high_eduf.png at 1,667 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 2.0 MB.

  • 23 images in older formats

    23 images (4.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 21 images below the first screen load straight away

    21 images further down the page (4.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    techmahaimpact-2026-mumbai.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.64 g of CO₂e: 436.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7188
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 93 images without alt text

    93 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (27 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at eletsonline.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 24 internal links, 80 external

    The homepage links to 24 pages on eletsonline.com and 80 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Elets Technomedia is a technology and media research company that focuses on ICT in Governance, Education, Health and B…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “India's Fastest Growing B2B Media Company B2B Media Company”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Elets Technomedia: ICT in Governance, Health, Education & Banking”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://eletsonline.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Event, NewsArticle and Organization.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://eletsonline.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,021 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix79
  • 6 linked pages hidden from search

    /careers.php, /life-at-elets.php, /contact.php, /terms-conditions.php, /privacy-policy.php and /refund-cancellation-policy.php are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages share a title

    /, /careers.php, /life-at-elets.php, /contact.php, /terms-conditions.php and /privacy-policy.php and 1 other all use the title “Elets Technomedia: ICT in Governance, Health, Education & Banking”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    /careers.php, /life-at-elets.php, /contact.php, /terms-conditions.php, /privacy-policy.php and /refund-cancellation-policy.php use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /careers.php has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 internal pages checked

    We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 6 broken images

    6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://eletsonline.com/.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    47 of 47 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix79
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://eletsonline.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (eletsonline.com).

  • Valid certificate (60 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for eletsonline.com and is valid for another 60 days.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 31 links work

    All 31 links checked from your homepage (11 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    eletsonline.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    eletsonline.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 15 years old

    15 years

    eletsonline.com was registered in Oct 2011 through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    eletsonline.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 504 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 504 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “JOIN US”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Register” and “Sign Up”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges and “1,000+ Clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be eletsonline.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on eletsonline.com, including 15 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25