Website review, no card needed
enea.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202640 issues · 102 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on enea.pl, 19 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 148 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.2 s
2.9 s
3.6 s
4.3 s
5.0 s
5.7 s
enea.pl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.0 s · 1.2 MB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.2 s · 707 KiBAbout 707 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.2 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.
Document request latency
1.3 s · 292 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.3 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s
1.4 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce initial server response time
1.3 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.3 s on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 141 KiBAbout 141 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 612 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,927 HTML elements
The page has 2,927 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 1.4 s
1.4 sYour server takes 1.4 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 19 KiB19 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.4 s
20.4 sYour largest element takes 20.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Strony internetowe portalu enea.pl, operator.enea.pl oraz S…”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.4 s
21.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.9 s
12.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 148 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 147 ms
147 msReal visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 428 ms
428 msReal visitors wait 428 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
shutterstock_2323448587.jpg weighs 9.0 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
8.7 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shutterstock_2323448587.jpg at 5,368 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 8.7 MB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (9.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 94 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 94 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (50), stylesheets 470 KiB (18) and HTML 449 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
ENEA_magazyn_energii_baner_1280x430_sticker_10-2026_1.png.we is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.93 g of CO₂e: 111.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 60 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “Enea”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.enea.pl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
122 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 122 pages on enea.pl and 30 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Strona główna”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.enea.pl/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,556 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/male-firmy, /biznes, /strona-korporacyjna, /transformacja-energetyczna/enea-eko, /dla-domu/oferta and /dla-domu/urzadzenia and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
/transformacja-energetyczna/enea-eko, /enea-search/enea-search-modal, /eneasprzedaz and /klimatyzacje have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
38 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://moja.enea.pl/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (enea.pl).
Valid certificate (15 days left)
The certificate from Asseco Data Systems S.A. · Certum OV TLS G2 E39 CA verifies for enea.pl and is valid for another 15 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://enea.pl redirects to the secure version.
All 57 links work
All 57 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
enea.pl's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 yearsenea.pl was registered in Oct 2002 through nazwa.pl sp. z o.o.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, digicert.com, geotrust.com and certum.pl to issue certificates for enea.pl, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Oct 2027
enea.pl is registered until Oct 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,255 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,255 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx a:mail01.enea.pl ip4:91.233.18.81 ip4:91.233.18.80 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal 11 (https://www.drupal.org)
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Enea
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on enea.pl, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.