Website review, no card needed

enfabebe.pe logo

enfabebe.pe website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202630 issues · 65 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on enfabebe.pe, 13 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s3.0 sMay 23Nov 73.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.2 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.6 s
Nov 7, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
184 ms130 msMay 23Nov 7136 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026176 ms
Jun 6, 2026178 ms
Jun 13, 2026171 ms
Jun 20, 2026158 ms
Jun 27, 2026150 ms
Jul 4, 2026151 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026160 ms
Jul 25, 2026173 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026165 ms
Aug 15, 2026160 ms
Aug 22, 2026163 ms
Aug 29, 2026161 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026152 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026149 ms
Oct 10, 2026149 ms
Oct 17, 2026149 ms
Oct 24, 2026137 ms
Oct 31, 2026136 ms
Nov 7, 2026136 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of enfabebe.pe (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. enfabebe.pe at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. enfabebe.pe at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. enfabebe.pe at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. enfabebe.pe at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. enfabebe.pe at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. enfabebe.pe at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. enfabebe.pe at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. enfabebe.pe at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 392 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (392 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.0 s · 288 KiB

    About 288 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 750 ms.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, TikTok and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.2 MB and 373 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    380 KiB

    8 images could be 380 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 49 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • contentstack.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    contentstack.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    71 KiB

    About 71 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 688 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 118 ms

    118 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 118 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    Your largest element takes 18.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Somos una comunidad de mamás y papás como tú, que buscan ma…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.8 s

    20.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Real visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 53 ms

    53 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 53 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 56 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 56 requests on a phone: HTML 1.6 MB (1), other files 915 KiB (18) and scripts 789 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    enfabebe_pe_Header_image.jpeg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.07 g of CO₂e: 128.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9597
  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10081
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected end of JSON input)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 2 internal links

    The homepage links to only 2 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “EnfaBebé Perú te ofrece fórmulas infantiles Enfamil®, Enfagrow®, junto a consejos de embarazo, desarrollo infantil y en…”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Fórmulas, embarazo y cuidado del bebé”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.clubenfabebe.com//.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.clubenfabebe.com/pe/sitemap-0.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 301 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.clubenfabebe.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 301 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 301 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at enfabebe.pe, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

Framework
Gatsby
E-commerce
10 Shopify Products;Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on enfabebe.pe, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25