Website review, no card needed
enoahisolution.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202635 issues · 93 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on enoahisolution.com, 13 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 133 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.6 s
3.9 s
5.2 s
6.6 s
7.9 s
9.2 s
10.5 s
enoahisolution.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 333 KiB7 images could be 333 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 259 KiBAbout 259 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 88 KiBAbout 88 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 270 ms
270 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 494 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,964 HTML elements
The page has 1,964 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google Analytics and others), adding 506 KiB and 275 ms of main-thread time.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 123 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 555 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.5 s
12.5 sYour largest element takes 12.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Turn Enterprise AI into Real Business Impact”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.5 s).
Time to Interactive: 12.5 s
12.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.483
0.483The layout shifts by 0.483 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 157 ms
157 msReal visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors
-30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 134 ms
134 msScripts block the page for only 134 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 65.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 61 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 61 requests on a phone: scripts 639 KiB (10), images 573 KiB (25) and fonts 567 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
29 form fields without a label
29 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 107 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “eNoah iSolution - IT Services, Solutions & Consulting | BPO Services”.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Information Technology Services”, “Turn Enterprise AI into Real Business Impact” and “eNoryx AI: The Enterprise AI Platform”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (245 characters)
Your meta description is 245 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
174 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 174 pages on enoahisolution.com and 9 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://enoahisolution.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://enoahisolution.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,299 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/case-studies is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
/case-studies has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/ccm/collect?rcb=16&frm=0&apvc=1&ae=g&en=page_view&dl=https%3A%2F%2…”.
No HTML doctype
The page has no <!DOCTYPE html>, so browsers render it in quirks mode.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (enoahisolution.com).
Valid certificate (104 days left)
The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2025 verifies for enoahisolution.com and is valid for another 104 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
enoahisolution.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
enoahisolution.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearsenoahisolution.com was registered in Feb 2011 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
enoahisolution.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,141 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,141 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
7 short forms
7 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 227 testimonial or review blocks, 17 customer or partner logos and 9 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:136.143.188.0/24 ip4:135.84.80.0/24 ip4:135.84.82.0/24 ip4:117.20.43.11/32 ip4:199.67.64.0/24 ip4:136.143.18…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on enoahisolution.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.