entraid.com website review

About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.

6 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

About 268 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and qiota.com and others), adding 2.8 MB and 788 ms of main-thread time.

Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

Google CDN costs a phone 442 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 225 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

The page has 2,491 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

Smart AdServer costs a phone 29 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 149 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Your largest element takes 24.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 27.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 374 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 8.7 MB in 147 requests on a phone: scripts 4.0 MB (56), images 2.9 MB (36) and stylesheets 1.0 MB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

Mobile_-_Grand_Angle_345x600_-_Juillet.gif weighs 833 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

9 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

4 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.45 g of CO₂e: 294.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

15 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

Headings skip levels (h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

The homepage links to 547 pages on entraid.com and 28 external pages.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

/nouveautes, /essais-et-avis, /comparateur-materiel-agricole-rayons-x, /guide-achat, /reglementation and /nouveautes/desherbage-electrique and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 173 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: DATA LAYER INCLUSION VARIABLE DOES NOT EXIST”.

1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 links to other sites are dead, for example https://boutique.entraid.com/nos-offres-abonnement (404).

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.entraid.com/wp-json/qiota/login.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

entraid.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 852 words of visible text.

DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be entraid.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.