Website review, no card needed

epg.com logo

epg.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 104 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on epg.com, 11 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.6 s3.0 sMay 16Oct 313.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.2 s
May 23, 20265.2 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.1 s
Jun 13, 20265.6 s
Jun 20, 20265.7 s
Jun 27, 20266.0 s
Jul 4, 20266.6 s
Jul 11, 20267.1 s
Jul 18, 20267.8 s
Jul 25, 20268.0 s
Aug 1, 20267.8 s
Aug 8, 20267.7 s
Aug 15, 20267.2 s
Aug 22, 20266.9 s
Aug 29, 20266.7 s
Sep 5, 20265.9 s
Sep 12, 20265.7 s
Sep 19, 20264.9 s
Sep 26, 20264.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.6 s
Oct 10, 20264.4 s
Oct 17, 20264.4 s
Oct 24, 20264.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms98 msMay 16Oct 31117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026108 ms
May 23, 2026109 ms
May 30, 2026108 ms
Jun 6, 2026108 ms
Jun 13, 2026111 ms
Jun 20, 2026103 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026134 ms
Jul 25, 2026135 ms
Aug 1, 2026131 ms
Aug 8, 2026135 ms
Aug 15, 2026131 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026122 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026108 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms
Oct 24, 2026114 ms
Oct 31, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of epg.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. epg.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. epg.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. epg.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. epg.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. epg.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. epg.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. epg.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. epg.com at 6.5 s6.5 s

epg.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix54
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    78 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 499 KiB

    5 images could be 499 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • 3,718 HTML elements

    The page has 3,718 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (consentmanager.net, Google Tag Manager and clickcease.com and others), adding 606 KiB and 791 ms of main-thread time.

  • consentmanager.net adds 411 ms

    411 ms

    consentmanager.net costs a phone 411 ms of main-thread work and 195 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 380 ms

    380 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 380 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    337 KiB

    About 337 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 149 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    116 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (116 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 127 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Webinar Why Isn’t AI Speeding Up Your Warehouse? REGISTER N…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.164

    0.164

    The layout shifts by 0.164 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Real visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 200 ms

    200 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 200 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 140 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 140 requests on a phone: scripts 1,020 KiB (47), images 745 KiB (36) and fonts 436 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.68 g of CO₂e: 82.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 9091
  • 16 tap targets too small

    16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 101 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 21 links with vague text

    21 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (LocalBusiness and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “LocalBusiness: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 211 internal links, 48 external

    The homepage links to 211 pages on epg.com and 48 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Supply Chain Solutions | Advanced Software Solutions for Streamlined Logistics, Warehouse Management, Voice Picking, an…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Why Isn’t AI Speeding Up Your Warehouse?”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Supply Chain Solutions | EPG ONE”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://epg.com/us/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://epg.com/sitemaps.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,507 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (4 KiB, 5 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /us/aura is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /us/aura has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix89
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://epg.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (epg.com).

  • Valid certificate (69 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for epg.com and is valid for another 69 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    epg.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    epg.com was registered in Jun 1997 through Deutsche Telekom AG. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    epg.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    epg.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “1,600+ Customers”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 970 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 970 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REGISTER NOW”.

  • 25 calls to action

    The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Order Management System (OMS)”, “Learn more” and “Contact us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (7 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:eu.zcsend.net include:agenturserver.de include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sender.zohocrm.eu incl…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on epg.com, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25