ettsolutions.com website review

42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (52.0 MB).

4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.1 s.

About 973 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

About 753 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 778 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, iubenda and Clarity and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

3 images could be 179 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 429 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Real visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Your largest element takes 21.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Leader in Digital Transformation”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 25.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 6.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 760 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 53.2 MB in 77 requests on a phone: media 49.2 MB (7), scripts 1.8 MB (16) and images 996 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

1 image (43 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

2 images further down the page (71 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 15.08 g of CO₂e: 1809.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h3 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Your meta description is 180 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

The homepage links to 115 pages on ettsolutions.com and 25 external pages.

The robots meta tag says “max-image-preview:large, noarchive, nosnippet”, which tells Google, Bing and the AI answers built on them not to quote this page.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

HSTS is set, but max-age is 30 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

ettsolutions.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

ettsolutions.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 435 words of visible text.

DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ettsolutions.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.