Website review, no card needed
evidentid.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202629 issues · 98 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on evidentid.com, 4 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
evidentid.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Mobile performance score: 83
83/100Your mobile performance score is 83 (desktop: 69). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
480 ms · 396 KiBAbout 396 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cookiepro.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.0 MB and 652 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 409 ms
409 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 500 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
333 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (333 KiB).
1,732 HTML elements
The page has 1,732 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
21 KiB3 images could be 21 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.8 s
A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 881 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 12.4 s
12.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 214 ms
214 msReal visitors wait 214 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sYour largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Evident supplier risk dashboard”.
Total Blocking Time: 285 ms
285 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 285 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 3.0 s
3.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.012
0.012The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.012, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.41 g of CO₂e: 49.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.4 MB in 103 requests
1.4 MBYour homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 103 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (49), images 147 KiB (29) and fonts 70 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
88 text elements with low contrast
88 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
64 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 64 pages on evidentid.com and 3 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “Automate insurance verification and get risk intelligence before problems arise with Evident's supplier risk management…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Stop reacting to risk.Start getting ahead of it.”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Supplier Risk Management Platform | Evident”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.evidentid.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.evidentid.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,466 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (13 KiB, 56 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97222588&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=382e31c5-2f39-4b89-ba32-3a441605651c&bo=1&sid=b1b3dbf0ce5c11f1aff6e557f2005bc5&vid=b1b40390ce5c11f182e3e772130e55ce&vids=1&msclkid=N>m_t.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (evidentid.com).
Valid certificate (87 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for evidentid.com and is valid for another 87 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://evidentid.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 33 links work
All 33 links checked from your homepage (31 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
evidentid.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
evidentid.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 11 years old
11 yearsevidentid.com was registered in Jul 2015 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2027
evidentid.com is registered until Jul 2027.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,436 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,436 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a Demo”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Book a Demo” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, 16 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 2 open roles
- Teams
- Operations (2)
- Job board
- lever
- Careers page
- www.evidentid.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 29 issues on evidentid.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.