Website review, no card needed

evloop.io logo

evloop.io website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202637 issues · 106 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on evloop.io, 18 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.7 s6.0 sMay 16Oct 317.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20266.2 s
May 23, 20266.5 s
May 30, 20266.5 s
Jun 6, 20266.6 s
Jun 13, 20266.6 s
Jun 20, 20266.7 s
Jun 27, 20267.0 s
Jul 4, 20266.8 s
Jul 11, 20266.9 s
Jul 18, 20266.7 s
Jul 25, 20266.6 s
Aug 1, 20266.8 s
Aug 8, 20266.8 s
Aug 15, 20267.0 s
Aug 22, 20267.0 s
Aug 29, 20266.8 s
Sep 5, 20266.8 s
Sep 12, 20267.2 s
Sep 19, 20267.3 s
Sep 26, 20267.5 s
Oct 3, 20267.4 s
Oct 10, 20267.4 s
Oct 17, 20267.6 s
Oct 24, 20267.4 s
Oct 31, 20267.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
221 ms90 msMay 16Oct 31128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026109 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026162 ms
Jun 20, 2026195 ms
Jun 27, 2026204 ms
Jul 4, 2026206 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026182 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026131 ms
Aug 15, 2026125 ms
Aug 22, 2026122 ms
Aug 29, 2026115 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026119 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026127 ms
Oct 3, 2026129 ms
Oct 10, 2026128 ms
Oct 17, 2026134 ms
Oct 24, 2026131 ms
Oct 31, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix30
  • Improve image delivery

    5.3 s · 839 KiB

    2 images could be 839 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    26 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 217 KiB

    About 217 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 230 KiB

    About 230 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Osano CMP, Google Tag Manager and vtilt.com and others), adding 594 KiB and 888 ms of main-thread time.

  • Osano CMP adds 402 ms

    402 ms

    Osano CMP costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 64 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2 KiB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Real visitors wait 5.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 38.2 s

    38.2 s

    Your largest element takes 38.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A black electric vehicle is parked at a charging station, w…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 38.2 s

    38.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 38.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.2 s to 7.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Real visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 748 ms

    748 ms

    Real visitors wait 748 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 6.9 MB in 105 requests

    6.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (11), fonts 995 KiB (11) and scripts 917 KiB (45). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 4.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    3.9 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 625fb10ac140ebcc0c17a84073b61053-1-2-1.jpg at 4,205 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 3.9 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.95 g of CO₂e: 233.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 33 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on evloop.io and 6 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “Discover Loop's innovative EV charging infrastructure designed for homes, businesses, and cities. Future-proof your pro…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Why work with Loop?”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Loop Global | EV Charging Solutions for a Sustainable Future”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://loopglobal.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://loopglobal.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (400 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    /infinity-flash, /l2chargers, /ev-focus, /software, /driver-support and /news and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    /infinity-flash, /l2chargers, /ev-focus, /software, /driver-support and /news and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (loopglobal.com).

  • Valid certificate (39 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for evloop.io and is valid for another 39 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://evloop.io redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 16 links work

    All 16 links checked from your homepage (11 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    loopglobal.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    loopglobal.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 13 years old

    13 years

    loopglobal.com was registered in Jul 2013 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    loopglobal.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 385 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 385 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

1 to fix45
  • No DMARC policy

    evloop.io has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 45/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 2 plugins are behind their latest release.elementor 4.3.5 → 4.3.6 · cf7-conditional-fields 2.7.3 → 2.8.5

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.4
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
CloudFront

Hiring

Hiring
6 open roles
Teams
Sales & Business Development (6)
Job board
rippling

Company

Headquarters
El Segundo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on evloop.io, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25