Website review, no card needed

exelatech.com logo

exelatech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202634 issues · 94 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on exelatech.com, 16 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.9 s5.5 sMay 16Oct 316.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20266.7 s
May 23, 20267.0 s
May 30, 20267.0 s
Jun 6, 20267.3 s
Jun 13, 20267.5 s
Jun 20, 20267.5 s
Jun 27, 20267.7 s
Jul 4, 20267.4 s
Jul 11, 20266.8 s
Jul 18, 20266.6 s
Jul 25, 20266.3 s
Aug 1, 20266.2 s
Aug 8, 20266.4 s
Aug 15, 20266.3 s
Aug 22, 20266.2 s
Aug 29, 20266.0 s
Sep 5, 20265.7 s
Sep 12, 20266.0 s
Sep 19, 20266.0 s
Sep 26, 20266.4 s
Oct 3, 20266.6 s
Oct 10, 20266.6 s
Oct 17, 20266.4 s
Oct 24, 20266.4 s
Oct 31, 20266.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
174 ms139 msMay 16Oct 31153 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026160 ms
Jun 6, 2026158 ms
Jun 13, 2026160 ms
Jun 20, 2026160 ms
Jun 27, 2026160 ms
Jul 4, 2026155 ms
Jul 11, 2026147 ms
Jul 18, 2026144 ms
Jul 25, 2026143 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026152 ms
Aug 15, 2026151 ms
Aug 22, 2026149 ms
Aug 29, 2026149 ms
Sep 5, 2026149 ms
Sep 12, 2026152 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026170 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms
Oct 17, 2026161 ms
Oct 24, 2026159 ms
Oct 31, 2026153 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of exelatech.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. exelatech.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. exelatech.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. exelatech.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  4. exelatech.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  5. exelatech.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  6. exelatech.com at 9.6 s9.6 s
  7. exelatech.com at 11.2 s11.2 s
  8. exelatech.com at 12.8 s12.8 s

exelatech.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix60
  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 1.1 MB

    18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 133 KiB

    About 133 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 115 KiB

    About 115 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 518 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,021 HTML elements

    The page has 2,021 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, cloudflare.com and WordPress and others), adding 333 KiB and 213 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 36 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (36 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Real visitors wait 6.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.8 s

    30.8 s

    Your largest element takes 30.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “digitization”.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.0 s

    32.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.7 s to 6.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Real visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 13.7 MB in 136 requests

    13.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.7 MB in 136 requests on a phone: other files 5.9 MB (24), images 5.6 MB (54) and HTML 896 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.88 g of CO₂e: 466.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8168
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • [role]s are not contained by their required parent element

    [role]s are not contained by their required parent element (5 elements).

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (2 elements).

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 9 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 200 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 200 pages on exelatech.com and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “XBP Global is a workflow automation leader that leverages decades of industry experience, a global footprint, and Agent…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “AI enabled”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “XBP Global | AI-Powered Business Process Automation Services”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://xbpglobal.com/americas/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://xbpglobal.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix85
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /blog/xbp-europe-insights-podcast-maintaining-company-culture-across-multiple-geographies is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    /fr/americas and /de/americas all use the title “Home - Americas - XBP Global”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /solutions/invoice-to-pay and /solutions/legal-administration took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 3 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://exelatech.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (xbpglobal.com).

  • Valid certificate (60 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for exelatech.com and is valid for another 60 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 52 links work

    All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    xbpglobal.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    xbpglobal.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 1 year old

    1 year

    xbpglobal.com was registered in Mar 2025 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2028

    xbpglobal.com is registered until Mar 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • A 16-field form

    Your longest form asks for 16 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 33 words

    The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get in Touch” and “Request a Demo”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks, 1 trust badge and “over 2,000 clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:207.231.176.228 include:sendgrid.exela.global include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:148.16…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Exela

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on exelatech.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25