Website review, no card needed
exelatech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202634 issues · 94 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on exelatech.com, 16 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 6.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 153 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.6 s
3.2 s
4.8 s
6.4 s
8.0 s
9.6 s
11.2 s
12.8 s
exelatech.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.6 s · 1.1 MB18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 133 KiBAbout 133 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 115 KiBAbout 115 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 518 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,021 HTML elements
The page has 2,021 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, cloudflare.com and WordPress and others), adding 333 KiB and 213 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 36 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (36 KiB).
Minify CSS
150 ms · 18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 80 ms
80 msYour server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.2 s
6.2 sReal visitors wait 6.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 30.8 s
30.8 sYour largest element takes 30.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “digitization”.
Time to Interactive: 32.0 s
32.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.0 s
14.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.7 s to 6.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 140 ms
140 msReal visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 3 ms
3 msScripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.7 MB in 136 requests
13.7 MBYour homepage downloads 13.7 MB in 136 requests on a phone: other files 5.9 MB (24), images 5.6 MB (54) and HTML 896 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit
3.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.88 g of CO₂e: 466.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element (5 elements).
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (2 elements).
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
9 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
200 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 200 pages on exelatech.com and 14 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 157 characters
Your meta description is 157 characters: “XBP Global is a workflow automation leader that leverages decades of industry experience, a global footprint, and Agent…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AI enabled”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “XBP Global | AI-Powered Business Process Automation Services”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://xbpglobal.com/americas/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://xbpglobal.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/blog/xbp-europe-insights-podcast-maintaining-company-culture-across-multiple-geographies is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/fr/americas and /de/americas all use the title “Home - Americas - XBP Global”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages slow to respond
/solutions/invoice-to-pay and /solutions/legal-administration took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
3 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://exelatech.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (xbpglobal.com).
Valid certificate (60 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for exelatech.com and is valid for another 60 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 52 links work
All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
xbpglobal.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
xbpglobal.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 1 year old
1 yearxbpglobal.com was registered in Mar 2025 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2028
xbpglobal.com is registered until Mar 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
A 16-field form
Your longest form asks for 16 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 33 words
The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
23 calls to action
The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get in Touch” and “Request a Demo”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks, 1 trust badge and “over 2,000 clients”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:207.231.176.228 include:sendgrid.exela.global include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:148.16…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Exela
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on exelatech.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.