Website review, no card needed

faecratearchives.com logo

faecratearchives.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202632 issues · 87 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on faecratearchives.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s827 msMay 23Nov 7941 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 2026966 ms
May 30, 2026947 ms
Jun 6, 2026929 ms
Jun 13, 2026918 ms
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 2026933 ms
Jul 4, 2026922 ms
Jul 11, 2026911 ms
Jul 18, 2026867 ms
Jul 25, 2026875 ms
Aug 1, 2026860 ms
Aug 8, 2026859 ms
Aug 15, 2026949 ms
Aug 22, 2026915 ms
Aug 29, 2026924 ms
Sep 5, 2026935 ms
Sep 12, 2026924 ms
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 2026973 ms
Oct 3, 2026956 ms
Oct 10, 2026955 ms
Oct 17, 2026956 ms
Oct 24, 2026999 ms
Oct 31, 2026979 ms
Nov 7, 2026941 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
78 ms69 msMay 23Nov 770 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202672 ms
May 30, 202672 ms
Jun 6, 202672 ms
Jun 13, 202672 ms
Jun 20, 202672 ms
Jun 27, 202676 ms
Jul 4, 202676 ms
Jul 11, 202674 ms
Jul 18, 202675 ms
Jul 25, 202673 ms
Aug 1, 202672 ms
Aug 8, 202672 ms
Aug 15, 202670 ms
Aug 22, 202670 ms
Aug 29, 202671 ms
Sep 5, 202671 ms
Sep 12, 202671 ms
Sep 19, 202675 ms
Sep 26, 202677 ms
Oct 3, 202675 ms
Oct 10, 202674 ms
Oct 17, 202674 ms
Oct 24, 202671 ms
Oct 31, 202670 ms
Nov 7, 202670 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of faecratearchives.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. faecratearchives.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. faecratearchives.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. faecratearchives.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. faecratearchives.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. faecratearchives.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. faecratearchives.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. faecratearchives.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. faecratearchives.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

4 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 85 KiB

    About 85 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 44 KiB

    About 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20 KiB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google CDN and MailMunch and others), adding 136 KiB and 89 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 64 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 705 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    Your largest element takes 10.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “FAE CRATE October Past Items Sale Our October lineup will f…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 72 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 63 ms

    63 ms

    Real visitors wait 63 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 432 ms

    432 ms

    Real visitors wait 432 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 21 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.50 g of CO₂e: 60.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 109 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 109 requests on a phone: images 555 KiB (5), other files 541 KiB (32) and scripts 455 KiB (56). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7486
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8572
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “Fae Crate Archives”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 23 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 23 pages on faecratearchives.com and 7 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://faecratearchives.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://faecratearchives.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (292 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://faecratearchives.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://faecratearchives.com/pages/wishlist, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://faecratearchives.com/collections/all, https://faecratearchives.com/collections/markdown-sale and https://faecratearchives.com/collections/shirts have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 internal pages checked

    We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://faecratearchives.com/.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 251 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 251 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Shop Now” and “Subscribe”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at faecratearchives.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

developdt.com · printful.com · mailmunch.co

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on faecratearchives.com, including 9 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25