Website review, no card needed
fajasmariae.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202633 issues · 79 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on fajasmariae.eu, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #72,181 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #45,865 of 61,859 online storesbeats 22%
- #43,357 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 19%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 118 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.5 s
3.3 s
4.1 s
4.9 s
5.7 s
6.5 s
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
3.8 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 3.8 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
700 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
350 ms · 149 KiBAbout 149 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 79 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (79 KiB).
2,232 HTML elements
The page has 2,232 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, weglot.com and Amazon Web Services and others), adding 290 KiB and 156 ms of main-thread time.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 143 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
50 ms · 37 KiB37 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
70 KiB4 images could be 70 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
15 KiBAbout 15 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sYour largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 10.7 s
10.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.2 s
5.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 241 ms
241 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 241 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 118 ms
118 msReal visitors wait 118 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 488 ms
488 msReal visitors wait 488 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.036
0.036The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.036, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.0 MB in 310 requests
9.0 MBYour homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 310 requests on a phone: media 6.6 MB (1), other files 738 KiB (95) and images 699 KiB (43). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.55 g of CO₂e: 305.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
31 text elements with low contrast
31 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
25 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
4 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 7 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 4 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (84 characters)
Your title is 84 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Fajas Colombianas MariaE, postquirúrgicas, y uso diario – Fajas MariaE Internacional”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
66 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on fajasmariae.eu and 12 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 90 characters
Your meta description is 90 characters: “Las mejores fajas colombianas: Fajas postquirúrgicas, moldeadoras, reductoras, y maternas.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Fajas MariaE Internacional”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://intl.fajasmariae.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://intl.fajasmariae.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://intl.fajasmariae.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/cinturillas, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
6 pages share a meta description
https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/mas-vendidos-home, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/nuevo, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/basicos, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/leggings, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/colas-invisibles and https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/brasieres use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/mas-vendidos-home, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/nuevo, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/basicos, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/moldeadores, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/todos-los-productos and https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/leggings and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/mas-vendidos-home, https://intl.fajasmariae.com/collections/todos-los-productos and https://intl.fajasmariae.com/products/short-en-powernet-fu101 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 403 words of copy
The homepage carries about 403 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fajasmariae.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Sa Variants · Transtore Translate Language · Powerful Form Builder · Cozy Country Redirect · Frontend · Mps Sales Notification · Whatsapp Chat · covet.pics · pickystory.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on fajasmariae.eu, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.