Website review, no card needed
falconpack.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202643 issues · 101 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on falconpack.com, 17 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 1.9 MBAbout 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 2.0 MB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudflarestream.com, Google Tag Manager and tidio.co and others), adding 3.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
cloudflarestream.com adds 977 ms
977 mscloudflarestream.com costs a phone 977 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 91 KiB5 images could be 91 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 282 ms
282 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 282 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
tidio.co adds 82 ms
82 mstidio.co costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.8 s
12.8 sYour largest element takes 12.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 25.8 s
25.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.2 s
14.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 724 ms
724 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 724 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 182 ms
182 msReal visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.086
0.086The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.086, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.3 MB in 147 requests
12.3 MBYour homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 147 requests on a phone: media 8.0 MB (5), scripts 3.2 MB (17) and images 722 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.49 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.49 g of CO₂e: 418.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
26 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 26 passed and 2 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “FalconPack”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
15 links with vague text
15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
9 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 9 pages on falconpack.com and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “CUSTOMIZEYOUR PACKAGING”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://falconpack.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://falconpack.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (253 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages share a title
/, /our-company/about-us, /our-company/chairman-message, /our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards and /our-company/infrastructure and 3 others all use the title “FalconPack”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
/our-company/about-us, /our-company/chairman-message, /our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards, /our-company/infrastructure and /our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
/our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and /careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
/our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards, /our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and /careers have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (falconpack.com).
Valid certificate (158 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for falconpack.com and is valid for another 158 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://falconpack.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 8 links work
All 8 links checked from your homepage (8 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
falconpack.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
falconpack.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 yearsfalconpack.com was registered in Jul 2001 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2028
falconpack.com is registered until Jul 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 313 words of copy
The homepage carries about 313 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on falconpack.com, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.