Website review, no card needed

falconpack.com logo

falconpack.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202643 issues · 101 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on falconpack.com, 17 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s3.9 sMay 9Oct 244.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.4 s
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20264.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.6 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.3 s
Aug 15, 20264.3 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20264.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
183 ms142 msMay 9Oct 24150 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026173 ms
May 16, 2026172 ms
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026165 ms
Jun 6, 2026178 ms
Jun 13, 2026173 ms
Jun 20, 2026165 ms
Jun 27, 2026174 ms
Jul 4, 2026169 ms
Jul 11, 2026168 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026163 ms
Aug 15, 2026167 ms
Aug 22, 2026155 ms
Aug 29, 2026156 ms
Sep 5, 2026156 ms
Sep 12, 2026157 ms
Sep 19, 2026165 ms
Sep 26, 2026170 ms
Oct 3, 2026165 ms
Oct 10, 2026150 ms
Oct 17, 2026147 ms
Oct 24, 2026150 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 1.9 MB

    About 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.3 s · 2.0 MB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudflarestream.com, Google Tag Manager and tidio.co and others), adding 3.1 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • cloudflarestream.com adds 977 ms

    977 ms

    cloudflarestream.com costs a phone 977 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 91 KiB

    5 images could be 91 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 282 ms

    282 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 282 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • tidio.co adds 82 ms

    82 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    Your largest element takes 12.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.8 s

    25.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.2 s

    14.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 724 ms

    724 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 724 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 182 ms

    182 ms

    Real visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.086

    0.086

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.086, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 147 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 147 requests on a phone: media 8.0 MB (5), scripts 3.2 MB (17) and images 722 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.49 g of CO₂e: 418.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9187
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 26 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 26 passed and 2 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8372
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “FalconPack”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 15 links with vague text

    15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 9 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 9 pages on falconpack.com and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “CUSTOMIZEYOUR PACKAGING”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://falconpack.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://falconpack.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (253 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 9 pages share a title

    /, /our-company/about-us, /our-company/chairman-message, /our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards and /our-company/infrastructure and 3 others all use the title “FalconPack”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    /our-company/about-us, /our-company/chairman-message, /our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards, /our-company/infrastructure and /our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and /careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /our-company/board-members, /our-company/awards, /our-company/qualitysafetyphilosophy and /careers have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9289
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (falconpack.com).

  • Valid certificate (158 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for falconpack.com and is valid for another 158 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://falconpack.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 8 links work

    All 8 links checked from your homepage (8 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    falconpack.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    falconpack.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    falconpack.com was registered in Jul 2001 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jul 2028

    falconpack.com is registered until Jul 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 313 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 313 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on falconpack.com, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25