Website review, no card needed
feel22.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202626 issues · 64 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on feel22.com, 8 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 237 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 240 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 261 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Not measured in this review.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 258 ms
258 msReal visitors wait 258 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 237 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 771 ms
771 msReal visitors wait 771 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.5 MB
5.5 MBYour homepage downloads 5.5 MB on a phone, 794 KiB of it images (14%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.57 g of CO₂e: 188.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
82 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
32 tap targets too small
32 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
16 images without alt text
16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
445 links without text
445 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Feel22 | Shop Makeup, Skincare & Perfume Online | Delivery in Lebanon”.
Meta description is long (166 characters)
Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
269 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 269 pages on feel22.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Feel22”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://feel22.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://feel22.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,145 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/collections/mac-feel22luxe has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
11 pages share a meta description
/collections/november-2026-bundles-offers, /pages/brands, /collections/minis-more, /pages/rewards, /collections/korean-brands and /pages/malaya-x-feel22 and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
7 pages without an H1
/pages/brands, /pages/rewards, /pages/malaya-x-feel22, /pages/feel22niche, /pages/feel22pro and /pages/feel22luxe and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/collections/minis-more took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 174 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
78 small tap targets
78 of 214 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[Dropper] Unable to find any <undefined-app> or <dsf-app> tag in your DOM.”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 77 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,105 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,105 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Track my order” and “Subscribe”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
49 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 49 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at feel22.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 17 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Sc Easy Redirects · Microsoft Clarity · Frequently Bought · Minmaxify Order Limits · Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Pushowl · Omnisend · Freegifts · Deco Labels Badges · stamped.io · amazonaws.com · gorgias.chat · influencerbit.com · bogos.io · kxcdn.com · 9gtb.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Beirut
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on feel22.com, including 3 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.