Website review, no card needed
fibrain.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202649 issues · 108 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on fibrain.com, 21 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #65,214 of 84,583 reviewed websitesbeats 20%
- #36,266 of 42,805 online storesbeats 13%
- #1,411 of 2,128 WooCommerce storesbeats 29%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 83 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 83 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 77 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 68 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 76 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.0 s · 4.3 MB102 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.3 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
350 ms · 1.4 MB18 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 69 KiBAbout 69 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, fibrain.pl and Google Analytics), adding 1.5 MB and 136 ms of main-thread time.
fibrain.pl adds 0 ms
0 msfibrain.pl costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 99 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 270 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.7 s
6.7 sReal visitors wait 6.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.2 s
6.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.4 s
15.4 sYour largest element takes 15.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “FIBRAIN Polish producer in the fiber optic sector and photo…”.
Time to Interactive: 15.6 s
15.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.2 s
10.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.612
0.612The layout shifts by 0.612 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 47% slower for real visitors
+47%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 6.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
21 images without width and height
21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 78 ms
78 msReal visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 83 ms to 76 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 59 ms
59 msScripts block the page for only 59 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.4 MB in 105 requests
4.4 MBYour homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (43), fonts 320 KiB (6) and scripts 245 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Centrum_Produktow_BANER.jpg weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images in older formats
7 images (1.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
15 images below the first screen load straight away
15 images further down the page (733 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.26 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.26 g of CO₂e: 150.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
21 images without alt text
21 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (31 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 31 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Polish producer in the fiber optic sector and pho…”, “Polish producer in the fiber optic sector and pho…” and “Polish producer in the fiber optic sector and pho…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://fibrain.pl/)”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
67 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 67 pages on fibrain.com and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “FIBRAIN - Polish producer in photonics and fiber optic sector”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://fibrain.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://fibrain.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (594 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/product-center, /meet-us, /career, /cooperation-with-fibrain, /contact and /category-projects-ue/eu-projects and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages without an H1
/product-center, /meet-us, /cooperation-with-fibrain, /contact, /b2b and /certificates and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/news took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 39 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
8 distorted images
8 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fibrain.com).
Valid certificate (114 days left)
The certificate from cyber_Folks S.A. · cyber_Folks verifies for fibrain.com and is valid for another 114 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://fibrain.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 46 links work
All 46 links checked from your homepage (36 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fibrain.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fibrain.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 21 years old
21 yearsfibrain.com was registered in Feb 2005 through OVH sas. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
fibrain.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 658 words of copy
The homepage carries about 658 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be fibrain.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx include:spf.tld.pl include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 6 plugins are behind their latest release.ultimate-blocks 3.6.0 → 3.6.1 · getwid 1.9.0 → 3.0.2 · cookie-notice 3.1.10 → 3.1.17 · yith-woocommerce-catalog-mode 2.58.0 → 2.59.0 · newsletter 9.3.9 → 9.5.3 · woocommerce 11.1.0 → 11.2.1
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Cf Krk
Company
- Headquarters
- Rzeszów
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on fibrain.com, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.