Website review, no card needed
fide.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202654 issues · 111 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on fide.com, 24 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 116 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.2 s · 7.7 MB45 images could be 7.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.1 s · 2.1 MB64 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
8.4 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.4 s.
Reduce unused CSS
4.8 s · 769 KiBAbout 769 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.0 s · 592 KiBAbout 592 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
4,152 HTML elements
The page has 4,152 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
800 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 31 KiB31 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 740 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify CSS
160 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics), adding 242 KiB and 90 ms of main-thread time.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 299 ms
299 msYour server sent the HTML in 299 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.9 s
8.9 sThe first text or image appears after 8.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.2 s
23.2 sYour largest element takes 23.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.8 s
10.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
34 images without width and height
34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 134 ms
134 msReal visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 62 ms
62 msScripts block the page for only 62 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.2 MB in 170 requests
17.2 MBYour homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 170 requests on a phone: images 14.8 MB (99), scripts 1.2 MB (33) and stylesheets 1,016 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit
4.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.88 g of CO₂e: 586.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
160 images without alt text
160 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (63 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 63 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
42 links without text
42 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 12 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (135 characters)
Your title is 135 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “International Chess Federation – International Chess Federation official website. Chess T…”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at fide.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
53 internal links, 123 external
The homepage links to 53 pages on fide.com and 123 external pages.
2 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.fide.com/.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fide.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (707 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/about-fide and /about all use the title “About FIDE – International Chess Federation”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
/news, /fide-world-championship-cycle-2025-2026, /about-fide, /partners, /contacts and /category/fide-news and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /about, whose canonical is /about-fide. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
10 pages without an H1
/news, /fide-world-championship-cycle-2025-2026, /contacts, /category/fide-news, /category/chess-news and /fide-circuit-2026-2027 and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
/news, /fide-world-championship-cycle-2025-2026 and /about-fide took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.fide.com/.
53 small tap targets
53 of 82 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fide.com).
Valid certificate (127 days left)
The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for fide.com and is valid for another 127 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://fide.com redirects to the secure version.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (27 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 18 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fide.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fide.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 31 years old
31 yearsfide.com was registered in Sep 1995 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Sep 2031
fide.com is registered until Sep 2031.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 859 words of copy
The homepage carries about 859 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download” and “SHOP”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “SHOP” and “Download”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:68.233.253.205 ip4:68.233.253.206 ip4:68.233.253.207 ip4:68.233.253.208 ip4:37.29.98.206 ip4:80.241.208…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Contabo
Company
- Founded
- 1924
- Headquarters
- Lausanne
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on fide.com, including 20 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.