Website review, no card needed
finstral.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202640 issues · 89 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on finstral.com, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 156 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 156 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 166 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.0 s · 247 KiBAbout 247 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
3,435 HTML elements
The page has 3,435 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 287 KiB5 images could be 287 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 95). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, zeppelin-group.com and VWO and others), adding 713 KiB and 431 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 40 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (40 KiB).
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 109 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 95 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 443 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s
8.9 sYour largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Experience windows anew.”.
Time to Interactive: 8.9 s
8.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 53% slower for real visitors
+53%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 875 ms
875 msReal visitors wait 875 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
15 images without width and height
15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.108
0.108The layout shifts by 0.108 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 166 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 164 ms
164 msReal visitors wait 164 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 162 ms
162 msScripts block the page for only 162 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
8 images in older formats
8 images (576 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (366 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
18 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example finstral-check-kit-en-ebenen.png at 400 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 18 KiB.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.50 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.50 g of CO₂e: 59.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.8 MB in 36 requests
1.8 MBYour homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 36 requests on a phone: images 976 KiB (20), scripts 562 KiB (9) and other files 95 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (8 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (72 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 72 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
62 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on finstral.com and 11 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Windows, entry doors and glass walls - Finstral”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.finstral.com/en/information/index/1-0.html.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.finstral.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (485 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (25 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
/en/company/company/10-0.html, /en/references/references/310-0.html, /en/architect-service/architect-service/12-0.html, /en/partner-programme/partner-programme/60-0.html, /en/contact/dealer-search/31-0.html and /fr/home/1-0.html and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
/en/partner-programme/partner-programme/60-0.html, /de/home/1-0.html, /it/home/1-0.html, /fr/home/1-0.html, /es/home/1-0.html and /pt/home/1-0.html and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/pt/home/1-0.html took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
21 small tap targets
21 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <path> attribute d: Expected path command, "…,0,0,0,47.2,109Z6Z".”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 690 words of copy
The homepage carries about 690 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at finstral.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1969
- Headquarters
- Unterinn
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on finstral.com, including 15 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.