Website review, no card needed
firstreliance.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202647 issues · 112 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on firstreliance.com, 22 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 153 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
10.4 s · 1.9 MB4 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 1.2 MB103 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.9 s
1.9 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 809 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Main-thread work: 16.7 s
A phone's processor spends 16.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 1.4 s
1.4 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
poshdevelopment.com adds 1.2 s
1.2 sposhdevelopment.com costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 23
23/100Your mobile performance score is 23. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and poshdevelopment.com and others), adding 4.0 MB and 5.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 205 KiBAbout 205 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 634 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
salemove.com adds 576 ms
576 mssalemove.com costs a phone 576 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Pendo adds 279 ms
279 msPendo costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 204 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,100 HTML elements
The page has 2,100 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.6 s
22.6 sYour largest element takes 22.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 18.1 s
18.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 7.1 s
7.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 7.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 39.3 s
39.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.119
0.119The layout shifts by 0.119 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 136 ms
136 msReal visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 241 ms
241 msReal visitors wait 241 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.9 MB in 282 requests
7.9 MBYour homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 282 requests on a phone: scripts 4.0 MB (134), images 2.7 MB (22) and other files 669 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
First-Reliance-Score.png weighs 517 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
840 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example First-Reliance-Score.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 840 KiB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.25 g of CO₂e: 269.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
206 internal links, 34 external
The homepage links to 206 pages on firstreliance.com and 34 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “First Reliance Bank, headquartered in Florence, SC, serves customers and businesses across South Carolina. There's More…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “First Reliance Bank, Your Neighbors. Your Bank.”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “First Reliance Bank – There's More to Banking Than Money”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://firstreliance.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://firstreliance.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,720 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without an H1
/personal/personal-banking/checking-accounts/order-checks, /contact-us, /personal/personal-banking/checking-accounts/debit-cards, /personal/personal-banking/savings-accounts, /personal/personal-banking/credit-cards and /personal/personal-borrowing have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'unshift')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://app.prod.digitallending.online/firstreliance/CustomerPortal/ (500).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://firstreliance3.mortgagewebcenter.com/Resources.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (firstreliance.com).
Valid certificate (74 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for firstreliance.com and is valid for another 74 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://firstreliance.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
firstreliance.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
firstreliance.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 27 years old
27 yearsfirstreliance.com was registered in Feb 1999 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2028
firstreliance.com is registered until Feb 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 72 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,346 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,346 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
25 calls to action
The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Apply for a Loan”, “Order Checks” and “Order Business Checks”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:68.232.131.30 ip4:68.232.140.103 ip4:68.232.143.79 ip4:68.232.149.148 ip4:204.116.170.25 a:monitor.ensenta.c…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
38 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 7.0.8; the current release is 7.1.4.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.0.8
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on firstreliance.com, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.