Website review, no card needed
fitbit.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202643 issues · 99 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on fitbit.com, 16 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 279 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 272 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 282 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 321 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
fitbit.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.9 s.
Google CDN adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,778 HTML elements
The page has 5,778 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 4.5 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 986 KiBAbout 986 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 843 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 309 KiB47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (309 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
387 KiBAbout 387 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Improve image delivery
308 KiB12 images could be 308 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms
0 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 109 ms
109 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 516 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 605 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 158 ms
158 msYour server sent the HTML in 158 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 1.00
1.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s
10.5 sYour largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Make every move a healthy one with Google Pixel and Fitbit.”.
Time to Interactive: 28.1 s
28.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.5 s
9.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 835 ms
835 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 835 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 306 ms
306 msReal visitors wait 306 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 279 ms to 321 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.036
0.036The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.036, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 154 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 154 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (49), images 1.6 MB (77) and fonts 1.3 MB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images in older formats
7 images (312 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.88 g of CO₂e: 225.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (14 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 59 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 1 failed. 7 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
34 links with vague text
34 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (223 characters)
Your meta description is 223 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
121 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 121 pages on fitbit.com and 2 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Google Fitbit, Pixel Watches & Trackers with Google Health”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://store.google.com/category/watches_trackers?hl=en-US.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://store.google.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
43%The HTML your server sends has 886 of the 2,083 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
15 pages without a title
/product/pixel_11_pro, /product/pixel_11_pro_fold, /product/pixel_11, /product/pixel_10a, /category/phones and /magazine/google_fi and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
15 pages without a meta description
/product/pixel_11_pro, /product/pixel_11_pro_fold, /product/pixel_11, /product/pixel_10a, /category/phones and /magazine/google_fi and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
/product/pixel_11_pro, /product/pixel_11_pro_fold, /product/pixel_11, /product/pixel_10a, /category/phones and /magazine/google_fi and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
/product/pixel_10a, /collection/accessories_wall, /magazine/refurbished_devices and /magazine/why_pixel took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 77 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
32 of 32 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
3 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://fitbit.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (store.google.com).
Valid certificate (61 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE2 verifies for fitbit.com and is valid for another 61 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fitbit.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 42 links work
All 42 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
google.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsgoogle.com was registered in Sep 1997 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only pki.goog to issue certificates for google.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Sep 2028
google.com is registered until Sep 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,083 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,083 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop phones with Fi”, “Shop watches with Fi” and “Start a repair”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be fitbit.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:169.45.146.28 ip4:209.249.223.128/26 ip4:167.89.100.142 ip4:167.89.100.139 ip4:167.89.18.128 ip4:198.21.0.21…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Company
- Employees
- 1,473
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- San Francisco
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on fitbit.com, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.