Website review, no card needed
fleshjack.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202634 issues · 73 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on fleshjack.eu, 12 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #67,002 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #42,978 of 61,859 online storesbeats 26%
- #40,774 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.5 s
5.4 s
6.3 s
7.2 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 453 KiBAbout 453 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Signyfyd adds 1.3 s
1.3 sSignyfyd costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 283 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 24
24/100Your mobile performance score is 24. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Signyfyd, Klaviyo and rebuyengine.com and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 779 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 123 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (123 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
450 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
1,715 HTML elements
The page has 1,715 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Klaviyo adds 137 ms
137 msKlaviyo costs a phone 137 ms of main-thread work and 330 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rebuyengine.com adds 125 ms
125 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 125 ms of main-thread work and 332 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
190 ms · 67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
191 KiB13 images could be 191 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
160 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.4 s
18.4 sYour largest element takes 18.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 20.6 s
20.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.295
0.295The layout shifts by 0.295 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 678 ms
678 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 678 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 329 ms
329 msReal visitors wait 329 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 399 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 399 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (179), images 1.6 MB (81) and other files 880 KiB (111). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.28 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 153.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
15 links without text
15 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 113 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “Fleshjack EU”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
15 H1 headlines
There are 15 <h1> headlines (“STAMINA TRAINING”, “THE ORIGINAL” and “TRIPLE-RING GRIP”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
114 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 114 pages on fleshjack.eu and 22 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.fleshjack.eu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fleshjack.eu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.fleshjack.eu/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/stamina-training-unit, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/boost, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/all-dildos, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/fleshjack-boys, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/dildo-accessories and https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/drying-units have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/all-products, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/all-dildos and https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/fleshjack-boys have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/fleshjack-boys, https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/mounts and https://www.fleshjack.eu/collections/dildo-accessories took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 console errors
3 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 (Bad Request)”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 678 words of copy
The homepage carries about 678 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Sign up”, “Contact Us” and “Order Status”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fleshjack.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Geoip Country Redirect · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Impact Com · Geolizr · Rebuy Personalization Engine · Freegifts · bablic.com · smile.io · signifyd.com · bogos.io · rechargecdn.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on fleshjack.eu, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.