Website review, no card needed
flowerstation.co.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202629 issues · 86 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on flowerstation.co.uk, 7 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: 5,634 HTML elements. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #25,168 of 108,953 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #16,605 of 61,775 online storesbeats 67%
- #16,115 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 65%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 163 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.8 s
4.6 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
Speed
5,634 HTML elements
The page has 5,634 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
350 ms · 432 KiB33 images could be 432 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 686 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Shopify adds 58 ms
58 msShopify costs a phone 58 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Shopify and lipscore.com and others), adding 827 KiB and 187 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
195 KiBAbout 195 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 ms · 141 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (141 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
46 KiBAbout 46 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.718
0.718The layout shifts by 0.718 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sYour largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors
+40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 6.0 s
6.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.7 s
3.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 145 ms
145 msReal visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 599 ms
599 msReal visitors wait 599 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 397 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 397 requests on a phone: images 984 KiB (53), other files 945 KiB (166) and scripts 927 KiB (108). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
pure-bliss-shadow__73344.1691515158.800.800__82494.169151520 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (35 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.93 g of CO₂e: 111.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
102 links without text
102 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (78 characters)
Your title is 78 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Flower Delivery London | Flower Shop Near Me | Florist London – Flower Station”.
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (Organization, Store and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “WebSite: url is not an absolute URL ("www.flowerstation.co.uk")”.
396 internal links, 47 external
The homepage links to 396 pages on flowerstation.co.uk and 47 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Same Day Flower Delivery London and UK by Flower Station. We are open 24 hours a day. Fresh flowers delivered Monday to…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Flower Delivery London UK”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,672 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/policies/shipping-policy, https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/pages/earn-rewards-at-flower-station and https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/pages/our-shops have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/collections/all-flowers, https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/pages/earn-rewards-at-flower-station, https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/collections/autumn-flowers, https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/collections/birthday, https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/collections/delivery-thank-you-floral-gifts and https://www.flowerstation.co.uk/collections/delivery-anniversary-day-floral-gifts and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 129 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://lantern.roeye.com/track.php?fingerprint=17fce222-1d5f-4aba-a94e-d38634697ba7&referrer=&landingpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flowerstation.co.uk%2F&useragent=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(iPhone%3B%20CPU%20iPhone%.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
166 of 188 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 878 words of copy
The homepage carries about 878 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All Flowers” and “Shop Autumn Flowers”.
21 calls to action
The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “Back Shop By Occassions”, “Back Shop By Category” and “Shop By Price”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 41 testimonial or review blocks and 10 trust badges.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 3 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at flowerstation.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Video Greet Gift Messages · Attribuly · Lipscore Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Loyoly · Seo Manager Venntov · Awin Affiliate Marketing · Add Ons · cloudfront.net · viddaylite.com · automizely.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on flowerstation.co.uk, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.