Website review, no card needed

focussoftnet.com logo

focussoftnet.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 107 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on focussoftnet.com, 20 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
244 ms181 msMay 9Oct 24237 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026197 ms
May 16, 2026197 ms
May 23, 2026199 ms
May 30, 2026201 ms
Jun 6, 2026198 ms
Jun 13, 2026200 ms
Jun 20, 2026203 ms
Jun 27, 2026199 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026193 ms
Jul 18, 2026188 ms
Jul 25, 2026190 ms
Aug 1, 2026193 ms
Aug 8, 2026199 ms
Aug 15, 2026203 ms
Aug 22, 2026209 ms
Aug 29, 2026213 ms
Sep 5, 2026211 ms
Sep 12, 2026211 ms
Sep 19, 2026212 ms
Sep 26, 2026211 ms
Oct 3, 2026220 ms
Oct 10, 2026228 ms
Oct 17, 2026229 ms
Oct 24, 2026237 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

12 to fix35
  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    50.1 s

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 50.1 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.4 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 373 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.0 MB

    15 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, youstarsbuilding.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 699 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (699 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 502 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,514 HTML elements

    The page has 1,514 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 79 ms

    79 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 79 ms of main-thread work and 407 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    38 KiB

    38 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 53.3 s

    53.3 s

    Your largest element takes 53.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Adapt and innovate with cloud ERP, CRM, and HCM application…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 67.1 s

    67.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 67.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 236 ms

    236 ms

    Real visitors wait 236 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 37 images without width and height

    37 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 237 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 17.6 MB in 223 requests

    17.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.6 MB in 223 requests on a phone: images 13.6 MB (89), scripts 2.8 MB (69) and fonts 841 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    industry-auto-2025.png weighs 554 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (554 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (554 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.98 g of CO₂e: 597.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7488
  • Images must have alternative text (6 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (2 elements).

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 8 links crawlers can't follow

    8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 255 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 255 pages on focussoftnet.com and 7 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Achieve digital transformation with Focus Softnet's ERP, CRM & HCM software. Cloud-hosted, customizable, and industry-s…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Business Software Designed to Think Ahead”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Focus Softnet: ERP, CRM, and HCM Solutions for Industries”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.focussoftnet.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and SiteNavigationElement.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.focussoftnet.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,800 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 137 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot set properties of undefined (setting 'value')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • 4 low-resolution images

    4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    48 of 49 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (focussoftnet.com).

  • Valid certificate (69 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for focussoftnet.com and is valid for another 69 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://focussoftnet.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    focussoftnet.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    focussoftnet.com was registered in Jul 2001 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and ssl.com to issue certificates for focussoftnet.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jul 2030

    focussoftnet.com is registered until Jul 2030.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,253 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,253 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Request a Free Demo”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Free Demo” and “SCHEDULE NOW”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (6 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks, 18 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 1 trust badge and “2,107,123+ Users”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on focussoftnet.com, including 23 speed issues and 1 SEO issue. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25