Website review, no card needed
foreyes.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202621 issues · 99 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on foreyes.com, 3 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
92A- #624 of 81,721 reviewed websitesbeats 99%
- #218 of 40,525 online storesbeats 99%
- #204 of 35,905 Shopify storesbeats 99%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 147 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
foreyes.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 298 KiB9 images could be 298 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 80
80/100Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
2,967 HTML elements
The page has 2,967 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Tealium and Optanon and others), adding 660 KiB and 295 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 ms · 215 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (215 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
245 KiBAbout 245 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 524 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 75 ms
75 msYour server sent the HTML in 75 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.9 s
4.9 sYour largest element takes 4.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 147 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 821 ms
821 msReal visitors wait 821 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.1 s
4.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 110 ms
110 msReal visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017
0.017The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 3 ms
3 msScripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.8 MB in 259 requests
3.8 MBYour homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 259 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (54), other files 898 KiB (99) and scripts 827 KiB (94). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (397 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (22 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.07 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.07 g of CO₂e: 127.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links look like plain text
4 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
41 links without text
41 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 143 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“For Eyes” and “FOR EYES BEST SELLERS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
287 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 287 pages on foreyes.com and 18 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 137 characters
Your meta description is 137 characters: “See our selection of your Favorite Brands of Eyeglasses, Sunglasses and Contact Lenses, then shop in-store. Eye Exams a…”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Browse Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses Online | For Eyes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.foreyes.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, OnlineStore, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.foreyes.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,354 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (5 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages share a meta description
/pages/locations, /pages/insurance and /pages/nuance-gen-2 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
/pages/locations and /pages/nuance-gen-2 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[Tealium Web Pixel] App may not be setup completely. Check the Theme App Extension: TypeError: Cannot read properties o…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
33 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.vogue-eyewear.com/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (foreyes.com).
Valid certificate (63 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for foreyes.com and is valid for another 63 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://foreyes.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 58 links work
All 58 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 18 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
foreyes.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsforeyes.com was registered in May 1996 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only globalsign.com, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and ssl.com to issue certificates for foreyes.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Oct 2028
foreyes.com is registered until Oct 2028.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 394 words of copy
The homepage carries about 394 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK EYE EXAM”.
22 calls to action
The homepage has 22 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Shop 40% Off Designer Eyeglasses!” and “Book eye exam”.
14 short forms
14 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Hiring
- Hiring
- 12 open roles
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on foreyes.com, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.