Website review, no card needed

foureditors.io logo

foureditors.io website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202636 issues · 81 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on foureditors.io, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 37.6 MB in 115 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.7 sJul 25Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms74 msJul 25Nov 7114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202680 ms
Aug 15, 202684 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202689 ms
Oct 17, 202694 ms
Oct 24, 2026111 ms
Oct 31, 2026103 ms
Nov 7, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of foureditors.io (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. foureditors.io at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. foureditors.io at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. foureditors.io at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. foureditors.io at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. foureditors.io at 4.0 s4.0 s
  6. foureditors.io at 4.8 s4.8 s
  7. foureditors.io at 5.6 s5.6 s
  8. foureditors.io at 6.4 s6.4 s

Speed

11 to fix54
  • Framer CDN adds 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Framer CDN costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 10.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 s · 1.4 MB

    21 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 7.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    27.4 MB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (27.4 MB).

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Framer CDN, Facebook and r2.dev and others), adding 37.6 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.

  • r2.dev adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    r2.dev costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 27.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 180 KiB

    About 180 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 349 ms

    349 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 349 ms of main-thread work and 282 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 276 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,376 HTML elements

    The page has 2,376 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.4 s

    14.4 s

    Your largest element takes 14.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Dashboard Image”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 656 ms

    656 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 656 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors

    +36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Real visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 576 ms

    576 ms

    Real visitors wait 576 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.055

    0.055

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.055, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 37.6 MB in 115 requests

    37.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 37.6 MB in 115 requests on a phone: media 33.0 MB (6), images 3.6 MB (69) and scripts 756 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    263 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CwjyUHkxiS4xRZ96zjYgduom6o.jpg at 3,014 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 263 KiB.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (382 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 10.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.66 g of CO₂e: 1279.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9489
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 93 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10086
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 76 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 76 pages on foureditors.io and 13 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Discover, customize, and drag premium-quality editing assets straight into your timeline — all in seconds. All your cre…”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “FOUR Studio | Unlimited Video & Audio Assets for Creators”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://foureditors.io/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://foureditors.io/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://foureditors.io/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,912 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 13 pages share a title

    /, https://foureditors.io/assets, https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/pricing and https://foureditors.io/customers and 7 others all use the title “FOUR Studio | Unlimited Video & Audio Assets for Creators”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 12 pages share a meta description

    https://foureditors.io/assets, https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/pricing, https://foureditors.io/customers and https://foureditors.io/helpcenter and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/customers and https://foureditors.io/features have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,279 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,279 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Pricing” and “View Pricing View Pricing”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “View PricingView Pricing” and “Contact usContact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at foureditors.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Framer
E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Hosting
Framer

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on foureditors.io, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25