Website review, no card needed
foureditors.io website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202636 issues · 81 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on foureditors.io, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 37.6 MB in 115 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #37,067 of 109,322 reviewed websitesbeats 60%
- #24,693 of 61,848 online storesbeats 54%
- #23,828 of 56,398 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 114 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Framer CDN adds 2.1 s
2.1 sFramer CDN costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 10.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
1.5 s · 1.4 MB21 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 7.4 s
A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
27.4 MB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (27.4 MB).
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Framer CDN, Facebook and r2.dev and others), adding 37.6 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
r2.dev adds 0 ms
0 msr2.dev costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 27.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 180 KiBAbout 180 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 349 ms
349 msFacebook costs a phone 349 ms of main-thread work and 282 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 276 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,376 HTML elements
The page has 2,376 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.4 s
14.4 sYour largest element takes 14.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Dashboard Image”.
Time to Interactive: 18.2 s
18.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 656 ms
656 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 656 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors
+36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 5.2 s
5.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 115 ms
115 msReal visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 576 ms
576 msReal visitors wait 576 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors
-28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.055
0.055The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.055, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 37.6 MB in 115 requests
37.6 MBYour homepage downloads 37.6 MB in 115 requests on a phone: media 33.0 MB (6), images 3.6 MB (69) and scripts 756 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
263 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CwjyUHkxiS4xRZ96zjYgduom6o.jpg at 3,014 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 263 KiB.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (382 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 10.7 g of CO₂ per visit
10.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.66 g of CO₂e: 1279.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 93 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
76 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 76 pages on foureditors.io and 13 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Discover, customize, and drag premium-quality editing assets straight into your timeline — all in seconds. All your cre…”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “FOUR Studio | Unlimited Video & Audio Assets for Creators”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://foureditors.io/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://foureditors.io/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://foureditors.io/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,912 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages share a title
/, https://foureditors.io/assets, https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/pricing and https://foureditors.io/customers and 7 others all use the title “FOUR Studio | Unlimited Video & Audio Assets for Creators”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
12 pages share a meta description
https://foureditors.io/assets, https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/pricing, https://foureditors.io/customers and https://foureditors.io/helpcenter and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://foureditors.io/tools, https://foureditors.io/integrations, https://foureditors.io/customers and https://foureditors.io/features have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,279 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,279 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Pricing” and “View Pricing View Pricing”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “View PricingView Pricing” and “Contact usContact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at foureditors.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Framer
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Framer
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on foureditors.io, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.