Website review, no card needed

freekibble.com logo

freekibble.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202643 issues · 87 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on freekibble.com, 19 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s1.1 sApr 18Oct 31.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.1 s
Apr 25, 20261.1 s
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.1 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
128 ms100 msApr 18Oct 3124 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026106 ms
Apr 25, 2026106 ms
May 2, 2026105 ms
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026122 ms
Jun 20, 2026123 ms
Jun 27, 2026124 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026122 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026120 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026124 ms
Sep 5, 2026124 ms
Sep 12, 2026124 ms
Sep 19, 2026124 ms
Sep 26, 2026123 ms
Oct 3, 2026124 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of freekibble.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. freekibble.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. freekibble.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. freekibble.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. freekibble.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. freekibble.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. freekibble.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. freekibble.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. freekibble.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix32
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.8 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.0 s · 963 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (963 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, adthrive.com and Stripe and others), adding 2.9 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 696 ms

    696 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 696 ms of main-thread work and 994 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • adthrive.com adds 346 ms

    346 ms

    adthrive.com costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 303 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 175 ms

    175 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 175 ms of main-thread work and 384 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    20 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    93 KiB

    2 images could be 93 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 61 but mobile only 32. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.0 s

    24.0 s

    Your largest element takes 24.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Even if your ____ dog spends half the day snoozing in a sun…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.6 s

    27.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Real visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 517 ms

    517 ms

    Real visitors wait 517 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.0 MB in 188 requests

    4.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 188 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (57), media 191 KiB (5) and other files 179 KiB (102). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (35 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.14 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 137.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8590
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 5 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10074
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “Freekibble”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (56 characters)

    Your meta description is only 56 characters: “Thank you for helping us feed and care for shelter pets!”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 19 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 19 pages on freekibble.com and 4 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.freekibble.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.freekibble.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (293 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix71
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    /happy declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 5 pages share 2 titles

    /, /kat and /litter all use the title “Freekibble”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /what-makes-you-happy has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    /kat, /litter and /happy use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /kat and /litter have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /happy/atticus and /what-makes-you-happy have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 9 internal pages checked

    We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://pixel.rubiconproject.com/token?pid=49096&us_privacy=1YNY.

  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 231 words

    The homepage has only about 231 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Learn More & Sign Up →” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (0 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 81 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 81 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at freekibble.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on freekibble.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25