Website review, no card needed
frutonanny.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202647 issues · 82 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on frutonanny.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.6 s · 9.9 MB21 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.1 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (rutube.ru, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.1 MB and 957 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 179 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (179 KiB).
rutube.ru adds 356 ms
356 msrutube.ru costs a phone 356 ms of main-thread work and 763 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 272 ms
272 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 272 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 173 ms
173 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 173 ms of main-thread work and 420 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 118 KiBAbout 118 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 201 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
200 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 200 ms.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 51 ms
51 msYour server sent the HTML in 51 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.6 s
21.6 sYour largest element takes 21.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.0 s
9.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
34 images without width and height
34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 250 ms
250 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 250 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.4 MB in 176 requests
16.4 MBYour homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 176 requests on a phone: images 13.4 MB (103), scripts 2.4 MB (22) and other files 395 KiB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 8.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
13 images far larger than shown
6.8 MB13 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example video_2.png at 1,904 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 6.8 MB.
31 images in older formats
31 images (11.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (8.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit
4.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.66 g of CO₂e: 559.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
33 images without alt text
33 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (74 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 74 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “Frutonanny”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://frutonanny.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at frutonanny.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
16 internal links, 103 external
The homepage links to 16 pages on frutonanny.com and 103 external pages.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,037 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://frutonanny.com/products all use the title “Frutonanny”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://frutonanny.com/products, https://frutonanny.com/articles, https://frutonanny.com/articles/a-unique-novelty-frutopuzzles-with-entertaining-cards-in-a-package, https://frutonanny.com/articles/meet-a-novelty-for-young-gourmets-milk-and-fruit-frutonanny-desserts, https://frutonanny.com/articles/novelties-for-little-gourmets-bulgur-with-turkey-and-spaghetti-bolognese and https://frutonanny.com/articles/the-main-new-product-of-the-season-is-frutopuffs-2 and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages slow to respond
https://frutonanny.com/articles, https://frutonanny.com/articles/a-unique-novelty-frutopuzzles-with-entertaining-cards-in-a-package, https://frutonanny.com/articles/meet-a-novelty-for-young-gourmets-milk-and-fruit-frutonanny-desserts, https://frutonanny.com/articles/novelties-for-little-gourmets-bulgur-with-turkey-and-spaghetti-bolognese, https://frutonanny.com/articles/the-main-new-product-of-the-season-is-frutopuffs-2 and https://frutonanny.com/articles/here-are-the-new-fruit-pieces-frutonanny-2 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 9 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
7 third-party cookies
7 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
About 591 words of copy
The homepage carries about 591 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Download catalog”, “Aversi online shop” and “NuKo online shop”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at frutonanny.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Hll As Hll Llc
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on frutonanny.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.