Website review, no card needed
fusionrm.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202624 issues · 91 checks
This review found 24 issues worth fixing on fusionrm.com, 4 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
90AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 981 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 981 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 992 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 85 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 122 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
fusionrm.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Mobile performance score: 84
84/100Your mobile performance score is 84 (desktop: 100). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 81 KiBAbout 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 24 KiB1 image could be 24 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 11 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11 KiB).
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Bizible and nitrocdn.com), adding 264 KiB and 32 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 120 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 32 ms
32 msYour server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Tap response (INP) got 38% slower for real visitors
+38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 85 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 962 ms
962 msReal visitors wait 962 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sYour largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Enterprise Resilience Is a Decision Problem”.
Time to Interactive: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 3.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors
-22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 3.2 s
3.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.2 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
6 images in older formats
6 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (946 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
4 images far larger than shown
389 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5f42ed223bb23a3fb3a38feb706ce0562e1e7eca-scaled-1.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 251 px. Resized copies would save about 389 KiB.
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.16 g of CO₂e: 19.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 584 KiB in 34 requests
584 KiBYour homepage downloads 584 KiB in 34 requests on a phone: other files 245 KiB (20), fonts 108 KiB (1) and stylesheets 88 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Home | Fusion”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
169 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 169 pages on fusionrm.com and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 108 characters
Your meta description is 108 characters: “Fusion Risk Management helps you confidently navigate disruption with precision, speed and total confidence.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Enterprise Resilience Software”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.fusionrm.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fusionrm.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,281 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/what-is-enterprise-resilience has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=56278628&Ver=2&mid=c9a0a51e-b51e-4066-830d-9b25d2aac008&bo=1&sid=3d5039e0d1ae11f183b1b719c73e661a&vid=3d504ac0d1ae11f1945cc970b75f4b48&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
52 small tap targets
52 of 74 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to find a valid digest in the 'integrity' attribute for resource 'https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSD…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fusionrm.com).
Valid certificate (52 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for fusionrm.com and is valid for another 52 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fusionrm.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 46 links work
All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fusionrm.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fusionrm.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 18 years old
18 yearsfusionrm.com was registered in Feb 2008 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
fusionrm.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,075 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,075 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST A DEMO”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Request a Demo”, “start the tour” and “Learn more about enterprise resilience”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 17 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:38.140.113.10 ip4:206.19.48.18 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:_spf.sa…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 223
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 24 issues on fusionrm.com, including 9 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.