Website review, no card needed

fwp.at logo

fwp.at website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202629 issues · 78 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on fwp.at, 13 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s671 msMay 2Oct 17973 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 2026973 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
82 ms63 msMay 2Oct 1769 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202671 ms
May 9, 202665 ms
May 16, 202665 ms
May 23, 202670 ms
May 30, 202670 ms
Jun 6, 202675 ms
Jun 13, 202677 ms
Jun 20, 202672 ms
Jun 27, 202673 ms
Jul 4, 202672 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202677 ms
Aug 15, 202677 ms
Aug 22, 202677 ms
Aug 29, 202670 ms
Sep 5, 202670 ms
Sep 12, 202671 ms
Sep 19, 202671 ms
Sep 26, 202672 ms
Oct 3, 202672 ms
Oct 10, 202671 ms
Oct 17, 202669 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fwp.at (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fwp.at at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. fwp.at at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. fwp.at at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. fwp.at at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. fwp.at at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. fwp.at at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. fwp.at at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. fwp.at at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

6 to fix67
  • Improve image delivery

    3.0 s · 6.1 MB

    14 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    2.9 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.9 s).

  • 5,101 HTML elements

    The page has 5,101 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 40 KiB

    About 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 248 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (248 KiB).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    105 KiB

    About 105 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 300 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 117 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Your largest element takes 8.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 69 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 643 ms

    643 ms

    Real visitors wait 643 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 109 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011

    0.011

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 24.7 MB in 83 requests

    24.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 24.7 MB in 83 requests on a phone: images 24.3 MB (74), scripts 219 KiB (2) and fonts 141 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    372 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mountain.gif at 1,000 px wide, shown at 222 px. Resized copies would save about 372 KiB.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (189 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 7.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    7.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.01 g of CO₂e: 841.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9093
  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10079
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Kompetenz, Teamgeist, Zielorientierung.”, “Das Team” and “Finden Sie Ihre Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwäl…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.fwp.at/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at fwp.at/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 222 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 222 pages on fwp.at and 11 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “fwp zählt mit über 130 hoch qualifizierten Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern zu den führenden österreichischen Anwaltsk…”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “fwp - Fellner Wratzfeld & Partner Rechtsanwälte”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,155 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /en all use the title “fwp - Fellner Wratzfeld & Partner Rechtsanwälte”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    /news, /expertise, /newsletter, /jurist-innen/josef-peer, /jurist-innen/michael-froner and /jurist-innen/markus-kajaba and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    43 of 46 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,150 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,150 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fwp.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on fwp.at, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25