Website review, no card needed
fwp.at website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202629 issues · 78 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on fwp.at, 13 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 973 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 71 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 65 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 65 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 70 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 69 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.0 s · 6.1 MB14 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Font display
2.9 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.9 s).
5,101 HTML elements
The page has 5,101 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 67
67/100Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
550 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 40 KiBAbout 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 248 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (248 KiB).
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Reduce unused JavaScript
105 KiBAbout 105 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 300 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 117 ms
117 msYour server sent the HTML in 117 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.3 s
8.3 sYour largest element takes 8.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.1 s
9.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 69 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 643 ms
643 msReal visitors wait 643 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s
1.6 sThe first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 109 ms
109 msScripts block the page for only 109 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011
0.011The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 24.7 MB in 83 requests
24.7 MBYour homepage downloads 24.7 MB in 83 requests on a phone: images 24.3 MB (74), scripts 219 KiB (2) and fonts 141 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images in older formats
7 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images far larger than shown
372 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mountain.gif at 1,000 px wide, shown at 222 px. Resized copies would save about 372 KiB.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (189 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 7.0 g of CO₂ per visit
7.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.01 g of CO₂e: 841.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Kompetenz, Teamgeist, Zielorientierung.”, “Das Team” and “Finden Sie Ihre Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwäl…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.fwp.at/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at fwp.at/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
222 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 222 pages on fwp.at and 11 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 128 characters
Your meta description is 128 characters: “fwp zählt mit über 130 hoch qualifizierten Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern zu den führenden österreichischen Anwaltsk…”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “fwp - Fellner Wratzfeld & Partner Rechtsanwälte”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,155 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and /en all use the title “fwp - Fellner Wratzfeld & Partner Rechtsanwälte”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages without a meta description
/news, /expertise, /newsletter, /jurist-innen/josef-peer, /jurist-innen/michael-froner and /jurist-innen/markus-kajaba and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
43 of 46 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,150 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,150 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks and 6 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fwp.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on fwp.at, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.