Website review, no card needed

gap.com.ph logo

gap.com.ph website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202644 issues · 112 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on gap.com.ph, 14 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
246 ms152 msMay 16Oct 31179 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026235 ms
May 23, 2026225 ms
May 30, 2026220 ms
Jun 6, 2026211 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026169 ms
Jul 4, 2026163 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026182 ms
Aug 1, 2026187 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026183 ms
Aug 22, 2026184 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026183 ms
Sep 19, 2026191 ms
Sep 26, 2026189 ms
Oct 3, 2026187 ms
Oct 10, 2026184 ms
Oct 17, 2026177 ms
Oct 24, 2026176 ms
Oct 31, 2026179 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of gap.com.ph (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. gap.com.ph at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. gap.com.ph at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. gap.com.ph at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. gap.com.ph at 4.8 s4.8 s
  5. gap.com.ph at 5.9 s5.9 s
  6. gap.com.ph at 7.1 s7.1 s
  7. gap.com.ph at 8.3 s8.3 s
  8. gap.com.ph at 9.5 s9.5 s

gap.com.ph does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 676 KiB

    About 676 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 1.1 MB

    25 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and tabarn.app and others), adding 10.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 186 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (186 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 26 ms

    26 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 26 ms of main-thread work and 9.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 493 ms

    493 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 493 ms of main-thread work and 637 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • 2,404 HTML elements

    The page has 2,404 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 196 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.1 s

    22.1 s

    Your largest element takes 22.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 383 ms

    383 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 383 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Real visitors wait 141 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 415 ms

    415 ms

    Real visitors wait 415 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 235 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • Page weight: 25.3 MB in 330 requests

    25.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 25.3 MB in 330 requests on a phone: media 20.4 MB (2), images 2.1 MB (50) and scripts 1.6 MB (94). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    I8_HAMNAV_TXT.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    86 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example DIVISION_BANNER_2026_Kids_2bbb0b89-2cc7-4726-a89b-6f5826304e at 610 px wide, shown at 174 px. Resized copies would save about 86 KiB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (461 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (256 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 7.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    7.17 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.17 g of CO₂e: 860.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7084
  • Positive tabindex

    133 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 23 images without alt text

    23 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (46 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 46 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 form fields without a label

    10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9279
  • Title is long (76 characters)

    Your title is 76 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Shop Gap for Casual Women's, Men's, Toddler & Kids Clothes - Gap Philippines”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“New”, “Women” and “Men”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (230 characters)

    Your meta description is 230 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 415 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 415 pages on gap.com.ph and 10 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://gap.com.ph/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://gap.com.ph/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,798 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /pages/vip-page, /pages/my-gap-page, /collections/women-new-arrivals, /collections/men-new-arrivals, /collections/gap-girls-new-arrivals-1 and /collections/boys-new-arrivals and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /collections/men-new-arrivals took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 170 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6583
  • 205 small tap targets

    205 of 277 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“CSS appearance value `slider-vertical` is not standardized and will be removed.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token ';'”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (gap.com.ph).

  • Valid certificate (47 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for gap.com.ph and is valid for another 47 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://gap.com.ph redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    gap.com.ph has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 734 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 734 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join” and “Shop New Arrivals”.

  • 71 calls to action

    The homepage has 71 calls to action, for example “Sign up here”, “Join” and “Shop New Arrivals”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 12 testimonial or review blocks and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel.

Email authentication

2 to fix60
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be gap.com.ph is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 60/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all include:mail.zendesk.com ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 38 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.

Apps your storefront loads

Helium Customer Fields · Pushowl · Cartbite · Discount Coupon In Cart Page · tabarn.app · pxucdn.com · loopclub.io · oxiapps.com · chimpstatic.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on gap.com.ph, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25