Website review, no card needed
gestioncapitalhumano.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 14 November 202634 issues · 82 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on gestioncapitalhumano.com, 12 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #30,995 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 66%
- #20,633 of 61,859 online storesbeats 60%
- #374 of 2,524 WooCommerce storesbeats 81%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.5 s
5.4 s
6.3 s
7.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
11.0 s72 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.0 s.
Main-thread work: 6.2 s
A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 144 KiBAbout 144 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
700 ms · 156 KiB235 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (156 KiB).
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 41 KiB2 images could be 41 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 286 KiBAbout 286 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 388 ms
388 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 355 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 297 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,523 HTML elements
The page has 1,523 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and mlroweb.com and others), adding 428 KiB and 390 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Minify JavaScript
40 KiB40 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 68 ms
68 msYour server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 11.3 s
11.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.2 s
13.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sYour largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “cropped-logo_principal.png”.
Real-user TTFB: 827 ms
827 msReal visitors wait 827 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
53 images without width and height
53 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 514 ms
514 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 514 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 136 ms
136 msReal visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 260 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 260 requests on a phone: scripts 949 KiB (81), images 654 KiB (93) and stylesheets 285 KiB (72). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (22 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
14 form fields without a label
14 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
84 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 84 pages on gestioncapitalhumano.com and 12 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Consultora de Recursos Humanos en Mendoza. Selección de personal, encuesta de remuneraciones, consultoría y formación. …”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Consultora de RRHH en Mendoza | Gestión Capital Humano”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://gestioncapitalhumano.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://gestioncapitalhumano.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,265 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://gestioncapitalhumano.com/llms.txt (18 KiB, 79 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js' violates the following Content Security Policy dire…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 56 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 180 words
The homepage has only about 180 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contactá a un asesor”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at gestioncapitalhumano.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on gestioncapitalhumano.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.