Website review, no card needed

getnet.net logo

getnet.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202637 issues · 97 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on getnet.net, 15 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s2.4 sJun 20Oct 173.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 20, 20263.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
219 ms165 msJun 20Oct 17204 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 20, 2026212 ms
Jun 27, 2026213 ms
Jul 4, 2026207 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026199 ms
Jul 25, 2026189 ms
Aug 1, 2026187 ms
Aug 8, 2026182 ms
Aug 15, 2026177 ms
Aug 22, 2026173 ms
Aug 29, 2026171 ms
Sep 5, 2026174 ms
Sep 12, 2026183 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026209 ms
Oct 10, 2026208 ms
Oct 17, 2026204 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of getnet.net (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. getnet.net at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. getnet.net at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. getnet.net at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. getnet.net at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. getnet.net at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. getnet.net at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. getnet.net at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. getnet.net at 4.2 s4.2 s

getnet.net does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix58
  • Improve image delivery

    11.1 s · 3.2 MB

    5 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.6 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 222 KiB

    About 222 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 71). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 147 KiB

    About 147 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 71 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (71 KiB).

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Google Tag Manager and jQuery CDN), adding 384 KiB and 220 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 107 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 376 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.2 s

    30.2 s

    Your largest element takes 30.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The Leading AI Payments Company in Latin America and Europe”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.2 s

    31.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 212 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 114 ms

    114 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 114 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 8.0 MB in 62 requests

    8.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 62 requests on a phone: images 7.0 MB (33), scripts 474 KiB (11) and fonts 342 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3 home_hero_full-width.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (6.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (4.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.26 g of CO₂e: 271.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8580
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Getnet - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (65 characters)

    Your meta description is only 65 characters: “We are a leading AI payments company in Latin America and Iberia.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 49 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 49 pages on getnet.net and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Leading AI Payments Company in Latin America and Europe”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.getnet.net/en/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.getnet.net/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (704 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /en/our-solutions/in-person-payments, /en/our-solutions/online-payments, /en/our-solutions/omnichannel and /en/our-solutions/value-added-solutions use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /en/resources/client-stories has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Granite is not defined”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.getnet.cl/ (503).

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://getnet.net goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (getnet.net).

  • Valid certificate (100 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA OV R36 verifies for getnet.net and is valid for another 100 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://getnet.net redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 82 days

    getnet.net is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    getnet.net has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    getnet.net's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    getnet.net was registered in Jan 1999 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 734 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 734 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Sales” and “Contact sales”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix90
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 exists:%{i}.spf.us.gruposantander.com -all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
41 open roles
Teams
Business Development (13), Finance (7), Service Operations (5), Engineering & Systems (2)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 37 issues on getnet.net, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25