Website review, no card needed

getwellnetwork.com logo

getwellnetwork.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202629 issues · 103 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on getwellnetwork.com, 12 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms107 msMay 9Oct 24121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026122 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026135 ms
Jul 25, 2026135 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 2026112 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026116 ms
Oct 10, 2026119 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms
Oct 24, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of getwellnetwork.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. getwellnetwork.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. getwellnetwork.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. getwellnetwork.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. getwellnetwork.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. getwellnetwork.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. getwellnetwork.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. getwellnetwork.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. getwellnetwork.com at 6.5 s6.5 s

getwellnetwork.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix58
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 671 KiB

    12 images could be 671 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, osano.com and Facebook and others), adding 777 KiB and 740 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 232 KiB

    About 232 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 309 ms

    309 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 309 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 49 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    157 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (157 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    71 KiB

    About 71 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 58. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 861 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.52

    0.52

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.52 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Award-winning high-tech, high-touch care team support and p…”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.3 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 480 ms

    480 ms

    Real visitors wait 480 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 176 ms

    176 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 176 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Homepage-Graphic-New-1.svg weighs 15.6 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    162 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example paciai2.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 162 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (307 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.56 g of CO₂e: 67.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 2.0 MB in 111 requests

    2.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 903 KiB (38), scripts 760 KiB (24) and fonts 217 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8390
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Links must have discernible text (5 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Meta description is long (199 characters)

    Your meta description is 199 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 65 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 65 pages on getwellnetwork.com and 17 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “A Digital Whole Health Platform Built for the Patient Journey”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Get Well | GW RhythmX Digital Patient Engagement Platform”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.getwellnetwork.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, SoftwareApplication and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.getwellnetwork.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (813 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    /why-get-well has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://use.typekit.net/quz4tvz.css?ver=1747067192' violates the following Content Security Policy direc…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (getwellnetwork.com).

  • Valid certificate (41 days left)

    The certificate from GoDaddy.com, Inc. · Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2 verifies for getwellnetwork.com and is valid for another 41 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://getwellnetwork.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 53 links work

    All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

4 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    getwellnetwork.com was registered in Jul 1999 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only amazon.com, amazonaws.com, amazontrust.com and awstrust.com to issue certificates for getwellnetwork.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • DNSSEC is on

    getwellnetwork.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Jul 2028

    getwellnetwork.com is registered until Jul 2028.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 678 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 678 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 15 calls to action

    The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Schedule a demo”, “Learn more” and “Request a demo”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “served 100M+ patients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:216.70.90.149 ip4:23.21.134.180 ip4:68.71.224.15 ip4:65.52.232.173 ip4:157.55.209.64 ip4:62.13.150.47 ip4:13…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Teams
Engineering & AI- Get Well Network (3)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Employees
215
Founded
2000
Headquarters
Palo Alto

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on getwellnetwork.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25