Website review, no card needed

geus.dk logo

geus.dk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202635 issues · 81 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on geus.dk, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms80 msMay 9Oct 2485 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202681 ms
May 16, 202681 ms
May 23, 202682 ms
May 30, 202683 ms
Jun 6, 202684 ms
Jun 13, 202684 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202684 ms
Jul 4, 202685 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202683 ms
Jul 25, 202685 ms
Aug 1, 202684 ms
Aug 8, 202685 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202684 ms
Sep 12, 202684 ms
Sep 19, 202685 ms
Sep 26, 202685 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms
Oct 24, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of geus.dk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. geus.dk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. geus.dk at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. geus.dk at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. geus.dk at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. geus.dk at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. geus.dk at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. geus.dk at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. geus.dk at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

9 to fix43
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.7 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.7 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.5 s · 1.3 MB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.9 s · 383 KiB

    About 383 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 85). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (gopublic.dk, Siteimprove and Google Fonts and others), adding 3.6 MB and 120 ms of main-thread time.

  • gopublic.dk adds 109 ms

    109 ms

    gopublic.dk costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 3.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 47 KiB

    About 47 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,517 HTML elements

    The page has 1,517 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 109 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 43. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    5 KiB

    1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 169 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 249 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.44

    0.44

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.44 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Your largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.358

    0.358

    The layout shifts by 0.358 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 81 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 30 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 47 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 47 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (16), fonts 890 KiB (4) and stylesheets 396 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    geus_dk_logo_header.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 125.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10084
  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “GEUS”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“GEUS ansætter to nye vicedirektører”, “Klimatilpasning kan flytte forureningsfaner” and “Ny forskning viser, hvordan tørke udvikler sig i …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 176 internal links, 46 external

    The homepage links to 176 pages on geus.dk and 46 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark & Grønland (GEUS) leverer geologisk viden & data med fokus på grundva…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.geus.dk/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.geus.dk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.geus.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,248 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.geus.dk/om-geus/kontakt, https://www.geus.dk/om-geus/nyheder, https://www.geus.dk/energiressourcer/geotermi-og-jordvarme/stratigrafiske-metoder/sedimentaere-bassiner, https://www.geus.dk/natur-og-klima/jordskaelv-og-seismologi, https://www.geus.dk/natur-og-klima/jordskaelv-og-seismologi/overvaagning-af-seismisk-aktivitet and https://www.geus.dk/natur-og-klima/jordskaelv-og-seismologi/registrerede-jordskaelv-i-groenland-aeldre-version have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.geus.dk/energiressourcer/geotermi-og-jordvarme/aflejringsmodeller, https://www.geus.dk/energiressourcer/geotermi-og-jordvarme/geofysiske-metoder, https://www.geus.dk/energiressourcer/geotermi-og-jordvarme/stratigrafiske-metoder/sedimentaere-bassiner and https://www.geus.dk/energiressourcer/geotermi-og-jordvarme/stratigrafiske-metoder took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 145 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 21 small tap targets

    21 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 693 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 693 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Download jordartskort”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at geus.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Hetzner

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on geus.dk, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25