Website review, no card needed
gigo.com.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202626 issues · 81 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on gigo.com.co, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 5.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
88B- #5,228 of 108,841 reviewed websitesbeats 93%
- #2,908 of 61,763 online storesbeats 93%
- #2,825 of 56,363 Shopify storesbeats 92%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 970 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 994 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 960 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 934 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 924 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 904 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 889 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 922 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 949 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 964 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 94 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.1 s
3.1 s
4.1 s
5.2 s
6.2 s
7.2 s
8.3 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,171 HTML elements
The page has 3,171 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 386 KiB14 images could be 386 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.1 MB and 590 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
540 KiBAbout 540 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Shopify adds 247 ms
247 msShopify costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 598 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 229 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
62 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (62 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Duplicated JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 11.5 s
11.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sYour largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Modelos con hot shorts negros masculinos.”.
Speed Index: 5.4 s
5.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 374 ms
374 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 374 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s
1.9 sThe first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 94 ms
94 msReal visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 252 ms
252 msReal visitors wait 252 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.0 MB in 432 requests
5.0 MBYour homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 432 requests on a phone: other files 2.2 MB (235), images 1.6 MB (70) and scripts 952 KiB (84). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
PRUDENCE-NUDE-TRUNK-Sexy-rosa-boxer-for-man-with-cup-that-al is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (152 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 171.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
54 text elements with low contrast
54 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (6 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 94 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Gigo Underwear Colombia: Ropa Interior para Hombr…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
215 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 215 pages on gigo.com.co and 20 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “Compra ropa interior para hombre, suspensorios, lencería y trajes de baño en Gigo Underwear Colombia. Envío gratis desd…”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Gigo Underwear Colombia | Ropa Interior para Hombre”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.gigo.com.co/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: ClothingStore, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.gigo.com.co/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.gigo.com.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,845 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.gigo.com.co/policies/shipping-policy has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
66 of 79 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 971 words of copy
The homepage carries about 971 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
23 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at gigo.com.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on gigo.com.co, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.