Website review, no card needed

github.com logo

github.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202633 issues · 95 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on github.com, 11 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.0 sApr 18Oct 32.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.0 s
Apr 25, 20262.0 s
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
267 ms225 msApr 18Oct 3262 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026231 ms
Apr 25, 2026230 ms
May 2, 2026232 ms
May 9, 2026234 ms
May 16, 2026237 ms
May 23, 2026241 ms
May 30, 2026242 ms
Jun 6, 2026243 ms
Jun 13, 2026245 ms
Jun 20, 2026245 ms
Jun 27, 2026247 ms
Jul 4, 2026248 ms
Jul 11, 2026248 ms
Jul 18, 2026248 ms
Jul 25, 2026247 ms
Aug 1, 2026246 ms
Aug 8, 2026244 ms
Aug 15, 2026243 ms
Aug 22, 2026243 ms
Aug 29, 2026246 ms
Sep 5, 2026252 ms
Sep 12, 2026257 ms
Sep 19, 2026261 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026262 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of github.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. github.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. github.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. github.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. github.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. github.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. github.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. github.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. github.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

github.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 881 KiB

    About 881 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 847 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    910 ms · 168 KiB

    About 168 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 910 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (githubassets.com and ctfassets.net), adding 5.3 MB and 415 ms of main-thread time.

  • githubassets.com adds 415 ms

    415 ms

    githubassets.com costs a phone 415 ms of main-thread work and 4.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    559 KiB

    5 images could be 559 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,602 HTML elements

    The page has 1,602 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • ctfassets.net adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    ctfassets.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 685 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 171 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 59 ms

    59 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 59 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.28

    0.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 12.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    Your largest element takes 21.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The future of building happens together”.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.4 s

    26.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 301 ms

    301 ms

    Real visitors wait 301 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 343 ms

    343 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 343 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 231 ms to 262 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.072

    0.072

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.072, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 165 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 165 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (110), images 1.2 MB (18) and media 931 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (34 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.54 g of CO₂e: 185.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10080
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “GitHub · Change is constant. GitHub keeps you ahead. · GitHub · GitHub”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (186 characters)

    Your meta description is 186 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://github.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 105 internal links, 30 external

    The homepage links to 105 pages on github.com and 30 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The future of building happens together”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://github.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

2 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,081 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (28 KiB, 117 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /security/advanced-security/code-security and /security/advanced-security/secret-protection use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 4 links through redirect chains

    4 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://support.github.com/.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

9 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (github.com).

  • Valid certificate (49 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV E36 verifies for github.com and is valid for another 49 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://github.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    github.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    github.com was registered in Oct 2007 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only sectigo.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for github.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Oct 2028

    github.com is registered until Oct 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 867 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 867 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up for GitHub” and “Download GitHub Copilot app”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Sign up” and “Sign up for GitHub”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks, 6 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:192.30.252.0/22 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 33 issues on github.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25