gogglesoftware.io website review

2 images could be 429 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (347 KiB).

2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

4 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN, Cloudflare and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 101 KiB and 70 ms of main-thread time.

Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Device”.

The layout shifts by 0.18 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example hero-g.png at 3,326 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 368 KiB.

2 images (448 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.17 g of CO₂e: 20.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

There are 2 <h1> headlines (“The CRM system for selling on LinkedIn.” and “How much is GoggleCRM?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

No XML sitemap at https://gogglesoftware.io/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

The homepage links to only 4 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

/terms, /privacy, /cookies and /security all use the title “GoggleCRM - the system to convert LinkedIn leads to clients”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

/terms, /privacy, /cookies and /security have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

/terms, /privacy, /cookies and /security have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 480 words of visible text.

The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.