Website review, no card needed
gtt.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202648 issues · 109 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on gtt.com, 23 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 202 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.0 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 202 KiB1 image could be 202 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.1 s
A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 465 KiB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (465 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 862 ms
862 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 862 ms of main-thread work and 876 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
760 ms · 169 KiBAbout 169 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 388 ms
388 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 731 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 263 ms
263 msFacebook costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 232 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,087 HTML elements
The page has 2,087 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 215 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
160 ms · 4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
39 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.1 s
24.1 sYour largest element takes 24.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Firetruck using Miovision Opticom”.
Time to Interactive: 30.3 s
30.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.5 s
5.5 sThe first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.7 s
8.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.8 MB in 231 requests
7.8 MBYour homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 231 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (65), scripts 2.9 MB (72) and other files 406 KiB (65). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
510 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example deploy1.png at 1,350 px wide, shown at 302 px. Resized copies would save about 510 KiB.
16 images in older formats
16 images (4.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (2.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.20 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.20 g of CO₂e: 264.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 buttons without a name
6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
28 text elements with low contrast
28 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 form fields without a label
12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
158 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 158 pages on gtt.com and 20 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Opticom by Miovision clears the path for emergency vehicles & transit fleets cutting through intersections faster so yo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Traffic Signal Preemption for Cities That Can’t Afford to Slow Down”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Traffic Signal Preemption & Priority | Opticom by Miovision”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://miovision.com/opticom/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://miovision.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/gen-ai-agent has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /trafficlink/intersection-monitoring, whose canonical is /miovisionone/intersection-monitoring. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page slow to respond
/miovisionone/continuous-counts took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://id.rlcdn.com/464526.gif.
9 small tap targets
9 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'classList')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
3 links through redirect chains
3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://miovision.com/solutions/traffic-optimization-analytics/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (miovision.com).
Valid certificate (77 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for gtt.com and is valid for another 77 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://gtt.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 9 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
miovision.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
miovision.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 22 years old
22 yearsmiovision.com was registered in May 2004 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jan 2032
miovision.com is registered until Jan 2032.
Content and conversion
A 12-field form
Your longest form asks for 12 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,043 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,043 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Where to Buy” and “Book a Demo”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Where to Buy”, “Book a Demo” and “Call us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:aspmx.pardot.com ip4:23.25.152.237 ip4:23.25.152.238 ip4:23.25.152.232 ip4:23.2…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
63 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 63 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.2
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 21 open roles
- Teams
- Software Engineering (6), Sales (4), Hardware Engineering (3), Marketing (3)
- Job board
- ashby
Company
- Founded
- 2006
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on gtt.com, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.