Website review, no card needed
hatsgroup.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202637 issues · 104 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on hatsgroup.com, 16 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 90 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 86 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 20.2 MB118 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20.2 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 17.5 MB39 images could be 17.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 74
74/100Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
1,501 HTML elements
The page has 1,501 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, Google CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 660 KiB and 351 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
226 KiBAbout 226 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 429 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 15.9 s
15.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sYour largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Helpful colleagues ensuring passengers are safe and secure.”. Most of its time is resource load delay (8.1 s).
Time to Interactive: 7.5 s
7.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
152 images without width and height
152 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02
0.02The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 15 ms
15 msScripts block the page for only 15 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 20.7 MB in 157 requests
20.7 MBYour homepage downloads 20.7 MB in 157 requests on a phone: images 20.0 MB (110), scripts 627 KiB (27) and fonts 29 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 13.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
13 images far larger than shown
10.0 MB13 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Home-page-image.png at 1,856 px wide, shown at 341 px. Resized copies would save about 10.0 MB.
33 images in older formats
33 images (18.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
36 images below the first screen load straight away
36 images further down the page (17.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.9 g of CO₂ per visit
5.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.88 g of CO₂e: 705.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
99 images without alt text
99 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
164 links without text
164 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “Home - HATS Group HATS Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (10 characters)
Your meta description is only 10 characters: “HATS Group”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
81 internal links, 71 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on hatsgroup.com and 71 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.hatsgroup.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.hatsgroup.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (939 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages share a meta description
/about-us, /about-us/hats-values, /about-us/our-team, /our-services, /our-services/home-to-school-transport-services and /our-services/patient-transport-services and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
/about-us, /about-us/hats-values, /about-us/our-team, /our-services, /our-services/home-to-school-transport-services and /our-services/patient-transport-services and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
/about-us, /about-us/our-team, /our-services, /our-services/home-to-school-transport-services, /our-services/patient-transport-services and /our-services/mental-health-transport-services and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.slam.nhs.uk/our-services/hospital-care/bethlem-royal-hospital/ (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (hatsgroup.com).
Valid certificate (62 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for hatsgroup.com and is valid for another 62 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://hatsgroup.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
hatsgroup.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
3 checks passed
Domain is 17 years old
17 yearshatsgroup.com was registered in Jan 2009 through 123-Reg Limited. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
hatsgroup.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Jan 2029
hatsgroup.com is registered until Jan 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 750 words of copy
The homepage carries about 750 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Join the team”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks, 78 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 3.3.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- GoDaddy
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on hatsgroup.com, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.