Website review, no card needed
herzing.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202648 issues · 92 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on herzing.ca, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 274 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.9 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.9 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.9 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.7 s · 587 KiB28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (587 KiB).
hcaptcha.com adds 1.9 s
1.9 shcaptcha.com costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.0 s
A phone's processor spends 7.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (hcaptcha.com, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 3.9 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
500 ms · 1,023 KiB8 images could be 1,023 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
590 ms · 97 KiBAbout 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 590 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 125 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 125 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
440 ms · 65 KiB65 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 363 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,639 HTML elements
The page has 1,639 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
LiveChat adds 70 ms
70 msLiveChat costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 646 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
popupsmart.com adds 30 ms
30 mspopupsmart.com costs a phone 30 ms of main-thread work and 551 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 10.0 s
10.0 sThe first text or image appears after 10.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.6 s
20.6 sYour largest element takes 20.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 42.1 s
42.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 42.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 265 ms
265 msReal visitors wait 265 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 85% slower for real visitors
+85%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 274 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
22 images without width and height
22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 521 ms
521 msReal visitors wait 521 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 41% faster for real visitors
-41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.9 MB in 241 requests
8.9 MBYour homepage downloads 8.9 MB in 241 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (78), images 3.6 MB (85) and HTML 859 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (403 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
13 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example herzing-winnipeg-2025-v2-crop.jpg at 1,103 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 13 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (141 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.54 g of CO₂e: 304.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
6 dropdowns have no label.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
86 images without alt text
86 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
13 links with vague text
13 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
198 internal links, 32 external
The homepage links to 198 pages on herzing.ca and 32 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 154 characters
Your meta description is 154 characters: “Herzing College provides convenient, quality, career-focused training programs at campuses in Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Bachelor of Applied Cybersecurity”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Herzing College | Canadian Career College”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.herzing.ca/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollegeOrUniversity, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.herzing.ca/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,187 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
/programs/construction-management-technician and /programs/damage-insurance have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97162022&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=7ee79244-5ba3-4987-a394-b888b70d70b3&bo=1&sid=72639900d3e511f197c671a65add4c55&vid=7263a3e0d3e511f19a8cfd2790bc00f2&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
19 small tap targets
19 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Protected Audience API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 13-field form
Your longest form asks for 13 fields (12 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,311 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,311 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST INFORMATION”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Request Info” and “Request Information”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
30 cookies set on arrival
30Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at herzing.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on herzing.ca, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.