Website review, no card needed

hexclad.co.jp logo

hexclad.co.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202642 issues · 83 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on hexclad.co.jp, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.2 sMay 23Nov 72.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.9 s
Nov 7, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
146 ms114 msMay 23Nov 7142 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026127 ms
Jul 18, 2026123 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026125 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026133 ms
Sep 5, 2026133 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026131 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026135 ms
Oct 10, 2026141 ms
Oct 17, 2026141 ms
Oct 24, 2026142 ms
Oct 31, 2026142 ms
Nov 7, 2026142 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of hexclad.co.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. hexclad.co.jp at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. hexclad.co.jp at 2.7 s2.7 s
  3. hexclad.co.jp at 4.0 s4.0 s
  4. hexclad.co.jp at 5.3 s5.3 s
  5. hexclad.co.jp at 6.7 s6.7 s
  6. hexclad.co.jp at 8.0 s8.0 s
  7. hexclad.co.jp at 9.3 s9.3 s
  8. hexclad.co.jp at 10.6 s10.6 s

Speed

14 to fix35
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 2.8 MB

    32 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Main-thread work: 11.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, channel.io and alia-prod.com and others), adding 2.1 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 899 KiB

    About 899 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 557 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (557 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 898 ms

    898 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 898 ms of main-thread work and 688 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • channel.io adds 575 ms

    575 ms

    channel.io costs a phone 575 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • alia-prod.com adds 521 ms

    521 ms

    alia-prod.com costs a phone 521 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 345 ms

    345 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 270 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Osano CMP adds 337 ms

    337 ms

    Osano CMP costs a phone 337 ms of main-thread work and 87 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 343 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,827 HTML elements

    The page has 2,827 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 85 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 84 KiB

    About 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 87.8 s

    87.8 s

    Your largest element takes 87.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 32.8 s

    32.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 32.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 107.9 s

    107.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 107.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 670 ms

    670 ms

    Real visitors wait 670 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.076

    0.076

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.076, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 34.4 MB in 371 requests

    34.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 34.4 MB in 371 requests on a phone: fonts 13.8 MB (21), media 12.4 MB (1) and images 4.4 MB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (180 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 9.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    9.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.74 g of CO₂e: 1169.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 135 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10085
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is short (43 characters)

    Your meta description is only 43 characters: “HexClad は最高品質の素材で作られており、生涯使用できるように設計されています。”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 157 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 157 pages on hexclad.co.jp and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “HexClad ハイブリッド・フライパン | ヘックスクラッド 公式”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://hexclad.co.jp/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://hexclad.co.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://hexclad.co.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix73
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://hexclad.co.jp/products/orusuta4dian-setutogai-fu-ki and https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hitorimu-rasi2dian-setutogai-fu-ki-totobatugu-purezento-copy all use the title “HEXCLAD 人気フライパン2点セット(蓋付き) + トートバッグ(Onyx) | HexClad 公式”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection, https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/about-us, https://hexclad.co.jp/blogs/recipes, https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/npd, https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/best-sellers and https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/sets have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection, https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/stores, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/7pc-hexclad-set-w-lids-wok, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/6pc-hexclad-pot-set, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hybrid-roasting-pan-with-flat-rack and https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hybrid-oval-roasting-pan and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 17 small tap targets

    17 of 63 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 47 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 123 words

    The homepage has only about 123 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at hexclad.co.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Hreflang Manager · Convert Experiences · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Convert Web Pixel · juniphq.com · channel.io · rebuyengine.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on hexclad.co.jp, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25