Website review, no card needed
hexclad.co.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202642 issues · 83 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on hexclad.co.jp, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71C- #88,249 of 108,840 reviewed websitesbeats 16%
- #54,200 of 61,763 online storesbeats 10%
- #50,431 of 56,363 Shopify storesbeats 9%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 142 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.4 s · 2.8 MB32 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Main-thread work: 11.1 s
A phone's processor spends 11.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, channel.io and alia-prod.com and others), adding 2.1 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 899 KiBAbout 899 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
550 ms · 557 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (557 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 898 ms
898 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 898 ms of main-thread work and 688 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
channel.io adds 575 ms
575 mschannel.io costs a phone 575 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
alia-prod.com adds 521 ms
521 msalia-prod.com costs a phone 521 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 345 ms
345 msFacebook costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 270 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Osano CMP adds 337 ms
337 msOsano CMP costs a phone 337 ms of main-thread work and 87 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 343 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,827 HTML elements
The page has 2,827 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 85 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 84 KiBAbout 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 87.8 s
87.8 sYour largest element takes 87.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 32.8 s
32.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 32.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 107.9 s
107.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 107.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 129 ms
129 msReal visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 670 ms
670 msReal visitors wait 670 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.076
0.076The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.076, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 34.4 MB in 371 requests
34.4 MBYour homepage downloads 34.4 MB in 371 requests on a phone: fonts 13.8 MB (21), media 12.4 MB (1) and images 4.4 MB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images in older formats
4 images (180 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 9.7 g of CO₂ per visit
9.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.74 g of CO₂e: 1169.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 135 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is short (43 characters)
Your meta description is only 43 characters: “HexClad は最高品質の素材で作られており、生涯使用できるように設計されています。”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
157 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 157 pages on hexclad.co.jp and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “HexClad ハイブリッド・フライパン | ヘックスクラッド 公式”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://hexclad.co.jp/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://hexclad.co.jp/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://hexclad.co.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
https://hexclad.co.jp/products/orusuta4dian-setutogai-fu-ki and https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hitorimu-rasi2dian-setutogai-fu-ki-totobatugu-purezento-copy all use the title “HEXCLAD 人気フライパン2点セット(蓋付き) + トートバッグ(Onyx) | HexClad 公式”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection, https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/about-us, https://hexclad.co.jp/blogs/recipes, https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/npd, https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/best-sellers and https://hexclad.co.jp/collections/sets have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/egg_pan_collection, https://hexclad.co.jp/pages/stores, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/7pc-hexclad-set-w-lids-wok, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/6pc-hexclad-pot-set, https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hybrid-roasting-pan-with-flat-rack and https://hexclad.co.jp/products/hybrid-oval-roasting-pan and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
17 small tap targets
17 of 63 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_RESPONSE.NotSameOrigin”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 47 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 123 words
The homepage has only about 123 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at hexclad.co.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Hreflang Manager · Convert Experiences · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Convert Web Pixel · juniphq.com · channel.io · rebuyengine.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on hexclad.co.jp, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.