Website review, no card needed

hoffmanneitle.com logo

hoffmanneitle.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202629 issues · 95 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on hoffmanneitle.com, 5 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: 1 text element with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
988 ms475 msMay 16Oct 31929 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026616 ms
May 23, 2026553 ms
May 30, 2026558 ms
Jun 6, 2026534 ms
Jun 13, 2026715 ms
Jun 20, 2026761 ms
Jun 27, 2026764 ms
Jul 4, 2026746 ms
Jul 11, 2026679 ms
Jul 18, 2026691 ms
Jul 25, 2026698 ms
Aug 1, 2026786 ms
Aug 8, 2026792 ms
Aug 15, 2026742 ms
Aug 22, 2026736 ms
Aug 29, 2026677 ms
Sep 5, 2026742 ms
Sep 12, 2026765 ms
Sep 19, 2026765 ms
Sep 26, 2026777 ms
Oct 3, 2026769 ms
Oct 10, 2026826 ms
Oct 17, 2026862 ms
Oct 24, 2026848 ms
Oct 31, 2026929 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
249 ms49 msMay 16Oct 3178 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026116 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026180 ms
Jun 6, 2026226 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202685 ms
Jul 4, 202682 ms
Jul 11, 202675 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202685 ms
Aug 15, 202681 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202674 ms
Sep 5, 202673 ms
Sep 12, 202677 ms
Sep 19, 202678 ms
Sep 26, 202677 ms
Oct 3, 202676 ms
Oct 10, 202673 ms
Oct 17, 202672 ms
Oct 24, 202676 ms
Oct 31, 202678 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

4 to fix79
  • Mobile performance score: 79

    79/100

    Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    850 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    620 ms · 134 KiB

    About 134 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (jQuery CDN, Matomo and Unpkg and others), adding 165 KiB and 72 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    81 KiB

    3 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4 KiB).

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 102 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Your largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.1 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 52% slower for real visitors

    +52%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.6 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Real visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 518 ms

    518 ms

    Real visitors wait 518 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% faster for real visitors

    -41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 78 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009

    0.009

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    homepage-cover_26-09-29~-~media--d092565a--query.fe4b6886.we is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.15 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.15 g of CO₂e: 18.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 550 KiB in 36 requests

    550 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 550 KiB in 36 requests on a phone: scripts 203 KiB (11), images 174 KiB (12) and fonts 132 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9597
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10068
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “HOFFMANN EITLE – IP Law Firm”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.hoffmanneitle.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 73 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 73 pages on hoffmanneitle.com and 4 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “HOFFMANN EITLE is synonymous with experience and quality in intellectual property law, ensured by our highly skilled pa…”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (473 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 3 pages share a title

    /, /en and /ja all use the title “HOFFMANN EITLE – IP Law Firm”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /en and /ja use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    /en, /en/events, /en/contact, /de, /fr and /cn and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    /cn, /ja and /ko have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “names is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix83
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (hoffmanneitle.com).

  • Valid certificate (66 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for hoffmanneitle.com and is valid for another 66 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://hoffmanneitle.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 43 links work

    All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors; 6 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 76 days

    hoffmanneitle.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    hoffmanneitle.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    hoffmanneitle.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    hoffmanneitle.com was registered in Jan 2000 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 454 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 454 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 1 customer or partner logo and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:143571905.spf07.hubs…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Matomo
Hosting
SpaceNet GmbH

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
careers page

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on hoffmanneitle.com, including 9 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25