Website review, no card needed
hoffmanneitle.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202629 issues · 95 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on hoffmanneitle.com, 5 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: 1 text element with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 616 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 553 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 558 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 534 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 715 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 761 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 764 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 746 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 679 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 691 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 698 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 786 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 792 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 742 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 736 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 677 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 742 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 765 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 765 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 777 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 769 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 826 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 862 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 848 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 929 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 78 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
850 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).
Reduce unused JavaScript
620 ms · 134 KiBAbout 134 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (jQuery CDN, Matomo and Unpkg and others), adding 165 KiB and 72 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
81 KiB3 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4 KiB).
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 102 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sYour largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.1 s).
Largest content (LCP) got 52% slower for real visitors
+52%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.6 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 80 ms
80 msReal visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 518 ms
518 msReal visitors wait 518 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 41% faster for real visitors
-41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 78 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009
0.009The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
homepage-cover_26-09-29~-~media--d092565a--query.fe4b6886.we is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.15 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.15 g of CO₂e: 18.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 550 KiB in 36 requests
550 KiBYour homepage downloads 550 KiB in 36 requests on a phone: scripts 203 KiB (11), images 174 KiB (12) and fonts 132 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “HOFFMANN EITLE – IP Law Firm”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.hoffmanneitle.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
73 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on hoffmanneitle.com and 4 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “HOFFMANN EITLE is synonymous with experience and quality in intellectual property law, ensured by our highly skilled pa…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (473 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, /en and /ja all use the title “HOFFMANN EITLE – IP Law Firm”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
/en and /ja use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
12 pages without an H1
/en, /en/events, /en/contact, /de, /fr and /cn and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
/cn, /ja and /ko have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “names is not defined”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (hoffmanneitle.com).
Valid certificate (66 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for hoffmanneitle.com and is valid for another 66 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://hoffmanneitle.com redirects to the secure version.
All 43 links work
All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors; 6 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 76 days
hoffmanneitle.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
hoffmanneitle.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
hoffmanneitle.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearshoffmanneitle.com was registered in Jan 2000 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 454 words of copy
The homepage carries about 454 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 1 customer or partner logo and 6 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Matomo.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:143571905.spf07.hubs…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Matomo
- Hosting
- SpaceNet GmbH
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on hoffmanneitle.com, including 9 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.