Website review, no card needed
hogsalt.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202642 issues · 101 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on hogsalt.com, 15 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #61,277 of 83,495 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #34,200 of 41,923 online storesbeats 15%
- #539 of 956 Squarespace websitesbeats 35%
Closest competitors among online stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 80 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 80 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 81 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.1 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
4.2 s
hogsalt.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.5 s · 4.7 MB32 images could be 4.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 829 KiBAbout 829 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 39
39/100Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Squarespace, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Squarespace adds 929 ms
929 msSquarespace costs a phone 929 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 143 KiBAbout 143 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 96 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 96 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 41 KiB41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 320 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google CDN adds 183 ms
183 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 183 ms of main-thread work and 380 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
34 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (34 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 50 ms
50 msYour server sent the HTML in 50 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.9 s
33.9 sYour largest element takes 33.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “BEAUTIFUL VENUES, EXCEPTIONAL HOSPITALITY”.
Time to Interactive: 35.1 s
35.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.7 s
9.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 836 ms
836 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 836 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 80 ms to 81 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 68 ms
68 msReal visitors wait 68 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 397 ms
397 msReal visitors wait 397 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.2 MB in 167 requests
9.2 MBYour homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 167 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (53), scripts 1.8 MB (75) and fonts 731 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
web-4.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
3 images far larger than shown
110 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example web-4.jpg at 1,264 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 110 KiB.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.60 g of CO₂e: 312.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (LocalBusiness, Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: image is not an absolute URL ("//images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/67223ccb89a1690d7a8…”.
39 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 39 pages on hogsalt.com and 3 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Discover Hogsalt’s unique Chicago restaurants, offering fine dining, hospitality, and unforgettable culinary experience…”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Chicago’s Premier Dining Experiences | Hogsalt”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is http://www.hogsalt.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.hogsalt.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and description; logo and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/wine-club is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share a title
/wine-club, /about, /careers and /internships all use the title “The Story Behind Hogsalt Hospitality — Hogsalt”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
/rewards, /terms-rewards and /privacy-policy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages share a meta description
/wine-club, /about, /careers and /internships use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
/about, /careers, /internships and /gift-cards have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
/careers and /gift-cards have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://static1.squarespace.com/static/versioned-site-css/67223ccb89a1690d7a80caa4/231/5c5…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://hogsalt.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (hogsalt.com).
Valid certificate (46 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for hogsalt.com and is valid for another 46 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 16 links work
All 16 links checked from your homepage (13 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
hogsalt.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
hogsalt.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearshogsalt.com was registered in Feb 2011 through Wild West Domains, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
hogsalt.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 39 words
The homepage has only about 39 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “JOIN OUR MAILING LIST”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.createsend.com include:google.com include:_spf.ultipro.com include:_spf.mykronos.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Squarespace
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Squarespace
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on hogsalt.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.