Website review, no card needed

hola.com logo

hola.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202637 issues · 112 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on hola.com, 12 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.3 sApr 18Oct 31.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.5 s
Apr 25, 20261.7 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
206 ms165 msApr 18Oct 3194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026201 ms
Apr 25, 2026198 ms
May 2, 2026194 ms
May 9, 2026193 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026184 ms
May 30, 2026183 ms
Jun 6, 2026181 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026180 ms
Jun 27, 2026181 ms
Jul 4, 2026180 ms
Jul 11, 2026183 ms
Jul 18, 2026184 ms
Jul 25, 2026186 ms
Aug 1, 2026185 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026175 ms
Aug 22, 2026170 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026183 ms
Sep 19, 2026190 ms
Sep 26, 2026191 ms
Oct 3, 2026194 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of hola.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. hola.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. hola.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. hola.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. hola.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. hola.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. hola.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. hola.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. hola.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

hola.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix32
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Main-thread work: 11.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google/Doubleclick Ads, Rubicon Project and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.6 MB and 3.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 2.1 MB

    About 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 MB

    165 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 500 ms

    500 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 500 ms of main-thread work and 995 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ceros.com adds 409 ms

    409 ms

    ceros.com costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Rubicon Project adds 468 ms

    468 ms

    Rubicon Project costs a phone 468 ms of main-thread work and 245 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 427 ms

    427 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 427 ms of main-thread work and 459 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Amazon Ads adds 390 ms

    390 ms

    Amazon Ads costs a phone 390 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 328 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 73 KiB

    3 images could be 73 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    77 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 32. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 66.1 s

    66.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 66.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Shakira surprises fans by speaking Catalan: Star reveals th…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 201 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 190 ms

    190 ms

    Real visitors wait 190 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 523 ms

    523 ms

    Real visitors wait 523 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 8.0 MB in 1,134 requests

    8.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 1,134 requests on a phone: scripts 5.4 MB (147), media 674 KiB (3) and images 584 KiB (334). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    c50d5d29d6a6-gettyimages-2295220876.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.27 g of CO₂e: 272.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9697
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 199 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 199 pages on hola.com and 13 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Top U.S. Latino publication covering celebrities, entertainment, fashion, beauty, recipes, lifestyle and updates about …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “HOLA! USA: Celebrity news, royals, entertainment and lifestyle”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “HOLA! USA: Celebrity news, royals, entertainment and lifestyle”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.hola.com/us/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ItemList, NewsMediaOrganization, SiteNavigationElement and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.hola.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers

    2 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 2 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,163 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    /us and / all use the title “HOLA! USA: Celebrity news, royals, entertainment and lifestyle”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /us. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 131 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 3583
  • 24 small tap targets

    24 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 23 third-party cookies

    23 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “VIDEOJS: ERROR: (CODE:4 MEDIA_ERR_SRC_NOT_SUPPORTED) The media could not be loaded, either because the server or networ…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 2 broken external links

    2 links to other sites are dead, for example https://www.hellomagazine.com/us/tags/royal-visits/ (404).

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://hola.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (hola.com).

  • Valid certificate (149 days left)

    The certificate from GoDaddy.com · GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 verifies for hola.com and is valid for another 149 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://hola.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    hola.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    hola.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    hola.com was registered in Aug 1995 through Entorno Digital, S.A.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Aug 2032

    hola.com is registered until Aug 2032.

Content and conversion

6 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,231 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,231 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:213.229.143.169 ip4:213.229.143.254 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.mandrillapp…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 34 cookies set on arrival

    34

    Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 68 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 68 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Founded
1944
Headquarters
Madrid

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 37 issues on hola.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25