Website review, no card needed

hsf.net logo

hsf.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202640 issues · 97 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on hsf.net, 7 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 15.2 MB in 90 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
193 ms140 msMay 9Oct 24159 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026162 ms
May 16, 2026160 ms
May 23, 2026153 ms
May 30, 2026156 ms
Jun 6, 2026155 ms
Jun 13, 2026162 ms
Jun 20, 2026170 ms
Jun 27, 2026170 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Jul 11, 2026179 ms
Jul 18, 2026183 ms
Jul 25, 2026187 ms
Aug 1, 2026176 ms
Aug 8, 2026173 ms
Aug 15, 2026170 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026160 ms
Sep 5, 2026154 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026155 ms
Oct 3, 2026161 ms
Oct 10, 2026163 ms
Oct 17, 2026159 ms
Oct 24, 2026159 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix70
  • Improve image delivery

    11.3 MB

    48 images could be 11.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.9 MB

    72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Google Tag Manager and YouTube and others), adding 12.2 MB and 483 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 11.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 494 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Hotjar adds 325 ms

    325 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 65 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 KiB

    About 260 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Document request latency

    235 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 184 ms

    184 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 184 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 34.6 s

    34.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 98 images without width and height

    98 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 532 ms

    532 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 532 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “HSF empowers students and parents with the knowledge and re…”.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 577 ms

    577 ms

    Real visitors wait 577 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 15.2 MB in 90 requests

    15.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.2 MB in 90 requests on a phone: images 11.8 MB (51), scripts 2.7 MB (20) and HTML 351 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    2.5 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 170fb432-e6d2-4b21-bdd0-7f3543d12e69.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 318 px. Resized copies would save about 2.5 MB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (3.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.30 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.30 g of CO₂e: 515.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9898
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5 and h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10077
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (25 characters)

    Your meta description is only 25 characters: “Hispanic Scholarship Fund”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Empowering Courageous Leaders”, “Our Partners” and “Making education a top priority”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.hsf.net/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 22 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on hsf.net and 0 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Hispanic Scholarship Fund: Home”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /corporate-partners/wells-fargo and /corporate-partners all use the title “Hispanic Scholarship Fund: Partners”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    /corporate-partners/wells-fargo, /support-hsf, /scholarship, /ways-to-volunteer, /event-calendar and /preparing-for-college and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /corporate-partners/wells-fargo, /support-hsf, /scholarship, /ways-to-volunteer, /event-calendar and /preparing-for-college and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages with very little text

    /scholarship-finder, /college-finder, /corporate-partners, /hsf-stories and /contact-us have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    95 of 95 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://hsf.net does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (hsf.net).

  • Valid certificate (102 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for hsf.net and is valid for another 102 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 20 links work

    All 20 links checked from your homepage (20 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    hsf.net has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    hsf.net's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    hsf.net was registered in Jun 1998 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    hsf.net is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 145 words

    The homepage has only about 145 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Apply Now” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a include:spf.intermedia.net include:amazonses.com include:spf-00808401.pphosted.com include:spf-00808402.pp…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Gatsby
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on hsf.net, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25