Website review, no card needed
hsf.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202640 issues · 97 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on hsf.net, 7 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 15.2 MB in 90 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 159 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
11.3 MB48 images could be 11.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.9 MB72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Google Tag Manager and YouTube and others), adding 12.2 MB and 483 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAmazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 11.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 494 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hotjar adds 325 ms
325 msHotjar costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 65 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
260 KiBAbout 260 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Document request latency
235 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Duplicated JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 184 ms
184 msYour server sent the HTML in 184 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 34.6 s
34.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.0 s
14.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
98 images without width and height
98 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 532 ms
532 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 532 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sYour largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “HSF empowers students and parents with the knowledge and re…”.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 129 ms
129 msReal visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 577 ms
577 msReal visitors wait 577 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 15.2 MB in 90 requests
15.2 MBYour homepage downloads 15.2 MB in 90 requests on a phone: images 11.8 MB (51), scripts 2.7 MB (20) and HTML 351 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
2.5 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 170fb432-e6d2-4b21-bdd0-7f3543d12e69.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 318 px. Resized copies would save about 2.5 MB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (3.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.3 g of CO₂ per visit
4.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.30 g of CO₂e: 515.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5 and h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (25 characters)
Your meta description is only 25 characters: “Hispanic Scholarship Fund”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Empowering Courageous Leaders”, “Our Partners” and “Making education a top priority”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.hsf.net/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
22 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 22 pages on hsf.net and 0 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Hispanic Scholarship Fund: Home”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/corporate-partners/wells-fargo and /corporate-partners all use the title “Hispanic Scholarship Fund: Partners”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages share a meta description
/corporate-partners/wells-fargo, /support-hsf, /scholarship, /ways-to-volunteer, /event-calendar and /preparing-for-college and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
/corporate-partners/wells-fargo, /support-hsf, /scholarship, /ways-to-volunteer, /event-calendar and /preparing-for-college and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages with very little text
/scholarship-finder, /college-finder, /corporate-partners, /hsf-stories and /contact-us have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
95 of 95 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://hsf.net does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (hsf.net).
Valid certificate (102 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for hsf.net and is valid for another 102 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 20 links work
All 20 links checked from your homepage (20 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
hsf.net has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
hsf.net's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearshsf.net was registered in Jun 1998 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
hsf.net is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 145 words
The homepage has only about 145 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Apply Now” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a include:spf.intermedia.net include:amazonses.com include:spf-00808401.pphosted.com include:spf-00808402.pp…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Gatsby
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on hsf.net, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.