Website review, no card needed

ibispaint.com logo

ibispaint.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202646 issues · 101 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on ibispaint.com, 16 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s811 msApr 18Oct 31.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026921 ms
Apr 25, 2026895 ms
May 2, 2026876 ms
May 9, 2026853 ms
May 16, 2026849 ms
May 23, 2026857 ms
May 30, 2026876 ms
Jun 6, 2026900 ms
Jun 13, 2026895 ms
Jun 20, 2026891 ms
Jun 27, 2026877 ms
Jul 4, 2026871 ms
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
69 ms66 msApr 18Oct 367 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202669 ms
Apr 25, 202668 ms
May 2, 202668 ms
May 9, 202667 ms
May 16, 202667 ms
May 23, 202667 ms
May 30, 202668 ms
Jun 6, 202669 ms
Jun 13, 202668 ms
Jun 20, 202667 ms
Jun 27, 202666 ms
Jul 4, 202666 ms
Jul 11, 202667 ms
Jul 18, 202667 ms
Jul 25, 202667 ms
Aug 1, 202666 ms
Aug 8, 202666 ms
Aug 15, 202666 ms
Aug 22, 202666 ms
Aug 29, 202666 ms
Sep 5, 202667 ms
Sep 12, 202667 ms
Sep 19, 202667 ms
Sep 26, 202667 ms
Oct 3, 202667 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ibispaint.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ibispaint.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ibispaint.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. ibispaint.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. ibispaint.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. ibispaint.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. ibispaint.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. ibispaint.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. ibispaint.com at 3.5 s3.5 s

ibispaint.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

5 to fix72
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 1.8 MB

    88 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.1 MB

    7 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    810 ms · 166 KiB

    About 166 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 810 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 50 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 129 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 921 ms

    921 ms

    Real visitors wait 921 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “ibisPaint for Mac. Finally Released!”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.128

    0.128

    The layout shifts by 0.128 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 3.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 69 ms to 67 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Real visitors wait 48 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    voisona-mobile-top.jpg weighs 544 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (618 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    309 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example voisona-mobile-top.jpg at 1,536 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 309 KiB.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.51 g of CO₂e: 61.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 92 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (66), scripts 273 KiB (10) and stylesheets 41 KiB (12). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7088
  • Images must have alternative text (40 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 40 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7363
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ibispaint.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ibispaint.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 30 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 30 pages on ibispaint.com and 8 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “ibisPaint - Draw and Paint App”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (434 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /ibisLogin.jsp, /art/monthly.jsp, /artist/yearly.jsp, /about.jsp, /lecture/index.jsp and /product.jsp and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    /ibisLogin.jsp, /art/monthly.jsp, /artist/yearly.jsp, /lecture/index.jsp, /product.jsp and /new.jsp and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /ibisLogin.jsp and /new.jsp have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9667
  • No mobile viewport

    No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.

  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 7 low-resolution images

    7 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://ibispaint.com/login.jsp?serviceID=ibis&defaultScreen=createAccount.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ibispaint.com).

  • Valid certificate (147 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for ibispaint.com and is valid for another 147 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ibispaint.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 28 links work

    All 28 links checked from your homepage (22 internal, 6 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ibispaint.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ibispaint.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 15 years old

    15 years

    ibispaint.com was registered in May 2011 through Interlink Co., Ltd.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    ibispaint.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 191 words

    The homepage has only about 191 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Sign Up” and “Download”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Email authentication

2 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    ibispaint.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    ibispaint.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Domain receives no email

    ibispaint.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 1.11.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Company

Founded
2011

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 46 issues on ibispaint.com, including 14 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25