Website review, no card needed
iij.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202648 issues · 104 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on iij.com, 17 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 149 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.2 s
4.8 s
iij.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 4.1 MB59 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s28 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Font display
1.3 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (bizris.com, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 393 KiB and 632 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 599 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
bizris.com adds 469 ms
469 msbizris.com costs a phone 469 ms of main-thread work and 197 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
471 KiB11 images could be 471 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
160 ms · 50 KiBAbout 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
92 KiBAbout 92 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 76 but mobile only 51. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.792
0.792The layout shifts by 0.792 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 9.7 s
9.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sYour largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Real-user CLS: 0.22
0.22For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 59 ms
59 msScripts block the page for only 59 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 83 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 83 requests on a phone: fonts 3.2 MB (2), images 789 KiB (21) and scripts 386 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (534 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “TOP | IIJ”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
44 links crawlers can't follow
44 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (10 characters)
Your meta description is only 10 characters: “【英新】IIJweb”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.iij.ad.jp/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at iij.ad.jp/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
35 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 35 pages on iij.com and 11 external pages.
2 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.iij.ad.jp/en/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
40%The HTML your server sends has 201 of the 497 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
3 pages share a meta description
/en/svcsol, /en/svcsol/category/mobile and /en/svcsol/case use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages with very little text
/en/svcsol, /en/personal and /en/ir/ir-event have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
50 of 50 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (iij.ad.jp).
Valid certificate (130 days left)
The certificate from Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd. · Cybertrust Japan SureServer CA G4 verifies for iij.com and is valid for another 130 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
All 39 links work
All 39 links checked from your homepage (28 internal, 11 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ad.jp has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 497 words of copy
The homepage carries about 497 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:216.98.98.186 ip4:206.132.175.142 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.securemx.jp ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 48 issues on iij.com, including 18 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.