Website review, no card needed

ikont.com logo

ikont.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202620 issues · 90 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on ikont.com, 5 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.5 sApr 25Oct 102.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.0 s
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms82 msApr 25Oct 10104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202694 ms
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 2026107 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026107 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 202696 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026109 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026106 ms
Sep 12, 2026109 ms
Sep 19, 2026110 ms
Sep 26, 2026109 ms
Oct 3, 2026109 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ikont.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ikont.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ikont.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ikont.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ikont.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ikont.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ikont.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ikont.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ikont.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

ikont.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

98
  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 129 KiB

    4 images could be 129 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 98

    98/100

    Your mobile performance score is 98 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 206 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “Hero Background”.

  • Time to Interactive: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The page is fully interactive after 2.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Speed Index: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.6 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    31 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example cc9145e9-84b1-481e-92ae-91348794bf26 at 1,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 31 KiB.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.50 g of CO₂e: 60.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 24 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 24 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (8), scripts 173 KiB (10) and other files 35 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9597
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9175
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ikont.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 35 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 35 pages on ikont.com and 7 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “InnovationKnow-HowOriginality”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Innovation Know-How Originality | IKO International”.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ikont.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (627 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /industries/semiconductors, /industries/life-sciences, /industries/medical, /industries/robotics, /industries/automation and /industries/packaging and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /product-selection-tools/linear-motion, /product-selection-tools/rotary-motion, /product-selection-tools/plain-bearings and /product-selection-tools/mechatronics have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.ptda.org/.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ikont.com).

  • Valid certificate (75 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for ikont.com and is valid for another 75 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ikont.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 34 links work

    All 34 links checked from your homepage (27 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ikont.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ikont.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    ikont.com was registered in Jun 1997 through Register.com - Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    ikont.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix64
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 690 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 690 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Expand Contact submenu”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Expand Contact submenu”, “Contact” and “Contact Us”.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Email authentication

2 to fix35
  • No SPF record

    ikont.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ikont.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Netlify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 20 issues on ikont.com, including 4 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25