Website review, no card needed
ilovesalt.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202624 issues · 56 checks
This review found 24 issues worth fixing on ilovesalt.com, 9 of them high impact, across 56 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 7.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 7.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 7.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
661 KiB4 images could be 661 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 160 KiBAbout 160 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
200 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 159 KiB and 105 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 93
93/100Your mobile performance score is 93. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 412 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.3 s
6.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 6.4 s
6.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.1 s to 7.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sYour largest element renders in 1.8 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Salt XC is a North American marketing agency that creates c…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 30 ms
30 msScripts block the page for only 30 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.8 MB in 49 requests
7.8 MBYour homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 49 requests on a phone: media 5.8 MB (4), images 1.1 MB (18) and fonts 507 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.20 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.20 g of CO₂e: 264.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 122 characters
Your meta description is 122 characters: “Salt is a North American marketing agency that created connected experiences through creative, digital & media innovati…”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Salt XC | Media & Experience Agency”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.saltxc.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 361 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.saltxc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 361 words of copy
The homepage carries about 361 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ilovesalt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- InMotion Hosting, Inc.
Hiring
- Hiring
- 35 open roles
- Teams
- Media (9), The Kitchen (9), Connections (3), Creators (3)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- www.saltxc.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Headquarters
- Toronto
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 24 issues on ilovesalt.com, including 8 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.