Website review, no card needed

ilovesalt.com logo

ilovesalt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202624 issues · 56 checks

This review found 24 issues worth fixing on ilovesalt.com, 9 of them high impact, across 56 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.5 s6.6 sMay 16Oct 317.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20267.1 s
May 23, 20266.8 s
May 30, 20266.8 s
Jun 6, 20267.1 s
Jun 13, 20267.1 s
Jun 20, 20267.2 s
Jun 27, 20267.4 s
Jul 4, 20267.8 s
Jul 11, 20267.7 s
Jul 18, 20267.4 s
Jul 25, 20267.6 s
Aug 1, 20267.4 s
Aug 8, 20267.6 s
Aug 15, 20267.9 s
Aug 22, 20268.1 s
Aug 29, 20268.2 s
Sep 5, 20267.9 s
Sep 12, 20267.6 s
Sep 19, 20267.7 s
Sep 26, 20267.6 s
Oct 3, 20267.7 s
Oct 10, 20267.8 s
Oct 17, 20267.3 s
Oct 24, 20267.3 s
Oct 31, 20267.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
189 ms111 msMay 16Oct 31171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026125 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026134 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026120 ms
Jul 11, 2026124 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026125 ms
Aug 8, 2026133 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026135 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026129 ms
Oct 3, 2026136 ms
Oct 10, 2026145 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026180 ms
Oct 31, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ilovesalt.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ilovesalt.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ilovesalt.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ilovesalt.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ilovesalt.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ilovesalt.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ilovesalt.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ilovesalt.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ilovesalt.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix93
  • Improve image delivery

    661 KiB

    4 images could be 661 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 160 KiB

    About 160 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    200 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 159 KiB and 105 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 93

    93/100

    Your mobile performance score is 93. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 412 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.1 s to 7.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.8 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Salt XC is a North American marketing agency that creates c…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 30 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 7.8 MB in 49 requests

    7.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 49 requests on a phone: media 5.8 MB (4), images 1.1 MB (18) and fonts 507 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.20 g of CO₂e: 264.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fix93
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9279
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “Salt is a North American marketing agency that created connected experiences through creative, digital & media innovati…”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Salt XC | Media & Experience Agency”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.saltxc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 361 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.saltxc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 361 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 361 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ilovesalt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
InMotion Hosting, Inc.

Hiring

Hiring
35 open roles
Teams
Media (9), The Kitchen (9), Connections (3), Creators (3)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Headquarters
Toronto

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 24 issues on ilovesalt.com, including 8 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25