Website review, no card needed
imtra.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202636 issues · 102 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on imtra.com, 17 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.1 s
3.1 s
4.1 s
5.2 s
6.2 s
7.2 s
8.3 s
imtra.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
14.7 s · 2.6 MBAbout 2.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.7 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 1.9 s
1.9 sYouTube costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 3.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 164 KiBAbout 164 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.1 s
A phone's processor spends 8.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 ms · 3.5 MB43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 5.1 MB and 3.1 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
2.4 MB19 images could be 2.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Google Tag Manager adds 463 ms
463 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 463 ms of main-thread work and 512 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 66 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 66 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 236 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 20.6 s
20.6 sThe first text or image appears after 20.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 36.9 s
36.9 sYour largest element takes 36.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Background”.
Speed Index: 21.2 s
21.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 46.5 s
46.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 51% faster for real visitors
-51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.2 MB in 178 requests
9.2 MBYour homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 178 requests on a phone: scripts 5.1 MB (76), images 3.2 MB (40) and HTML 293 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example herorotationoverland1-1786958171046-1792661455169.webp at 1,755 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
1 image over 500 KB
herorotationoverland1-1786958171046-1792661455169.webp weighs 559 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
herorotationoverland1-1786958171046-1792661455169.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (39 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (39 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.60 g of CO₂e: 312.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
66 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on imtra.com and 0 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Imtra is the leading provider of high-quality products for the marine, transportation, energy and marine. Discover a wi…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “COMPLETE SOLUTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL VESSELS.”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Imtra | Boating, Transportation, Energy & Marine Products”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.imtra.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.imtra.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; url and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (790 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /fynspray-pumps, whose canonical is /brands/fynspray-pumps. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages with very little text
/brands, /learning-center and /fynspray-pumps have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ Note that 'script-src' was not explicitly set, so 'default-src' is used as a fallback.”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (imtra.com).
Valid certificate (49 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for imtra.com and is valid for another 49 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://imtra.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 40 links work
All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
imtra.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
imtra.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsimtra.com was registered in Apr 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2030
imtra.com is registered until Apr 2030.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 19 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 666 words of copy
The homepage carries about 666 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Quote IconQuote icon for quote.QUOTE”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be imtra.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 65/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:6816940.spf07.hubspotemail.net -all”.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on imtra.com, including 18 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.